Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RetiredArmy
Errr, wasn’t he disbarred. So, even if he got back his license, I would think that he would not pass the fit deal.

It's not necessary to have a law license to serve as a Supreme Court Justice.

However, as I recall, the plea agreement that Clinton signed with the special prosecutor forbade him from practicing before the Supreme Court (the special prosecutor didn't and couldn't disbar him, that was up to the Arkansas Bar).

If one is forbidden to practice before the Supreme Court, it would be a little awkward to rationalize appointing him to its bench.

Not that a little thing like that ever kept the Clintons from doing anything...

40 posted on 12/15/2007 7:19:18 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
I thought Arkansas did disbar him for 5 years?
68 posted on 12/16/2007 5:30:04 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson