[SIDENET]

Right on cue, it’s the antigun whores.

[TheBattman]

I’m not going to be quite as brazen (or stupid) as to directly blame Hillary and her type for the recent attacks and murders...
BUT...

Isn’t it awfully convenient how every time such anti-gun sentiment seems to move to the back burner (no major issues since the assault weapons ban expired for example)...and the liberals want to bring it back up, it seems to always be accompanied by some act of violence that they can hang their coats on?

[marktwain]

“Such extraordinary firepower is not meant for hunting animals or target shooting. We see only one other purpose. And so did Murray.”

Such selective and unimaginative intellects.

Millions of so called “assault rifles” are owned by the general public, yet they number among the rarest of guns used in crime. This is diametrically opposed to the quote above, yet it doesn’t phase the authors that reality is so at odds with their world view.

They also see no contradiction between the fact that these rifles are “used by the military and police”, and their assertion that the rifles only use is to kill large numbers of people. They use their selective vision not to see that the police and military in America kill vanishingly small numbers of people with these rifles.

Cognitive dissonance for all the world to see.