To: VOA
Valdez avoided the identity-theft charge because a judge ruled that it was not a crime to use someones identity to obtain employment.I read that and could not believe what I was reading. If this is the case and the law of land what prevents the rest of us from making up SSA numbers or using someone else's and not paying taxes. Hope he gets over ruled and taken off the bench..I know dream on.
115 posted on
12/16/2007 8:59:04 AM PST by
engrpat
To: engrpat
“Valdez avoided the identity-theft charge because a judge ruled that it was not a crime to use someones identity to obtain employment.”
Good catch.
116 posted on
12/16/2007 9:01:24 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Just saying what 'they' won't.)
To: engrpat
Hope he gets over ruled and taken off the bench..I know dream on.
I dream as well.
In faint hope that this judge will be:
1. Removed from the bench
2. Indicted as a co-conspirator for EACH AND EVERY Identity
Theft committed committed after his ruling, within his area of
jurisdiction
3. Convicted for assisting felonious activities on a "class-action"
scale
4. Sent to jail for a long time
5. Have his name written on a "Judicial Hall of SHAME"
AND what really hurts bad-boy lawyers and judges the most:
6. Stripped of ALL post-employment benefits (pension, etc.)
AND required to pay an impossible fine for the "PRICELESS"
damage he's done to law-abiding citizens that his ruling will
ENCOURAGE and cause.
As with other Business and Legal Crimes...I do stop just short
of wishing the death penalty on this sort of peckerwood.
But on some days when I'm feeling mean, I would consider
the possibility of the death penalty for this sort of peckerwood
that knows (or should have known) the INCALCULABLE damage
he will cause to so many INNOCENT and LAW-ABIDING citizens.
By ENCOURAGING crime even as s/he sits as an "officer of the court".
126 posted on
12/16/2007 9:46:11 AM PST by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson