Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AliVeritas
Even the notoriously dovish International Atomic Energy Agency thought the NIE went too far. “To be frank, we are more skeptical,” a senior U.N. official told the New York Times.

You should know you're in trouble when the IAEA moves to the right of you.
4 posted on 12/16/2007 9:41:39 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (CNN: Full of plants from the DNC Plant-ation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rightwingintelligentsia
Hans Blix, former UN nuclear watchdog, said in Jerusalem Post, 12-5, that the NIE report was a political cover-your-ass exercise:

[Blix said the US agencies likely acted because they heard “all the rhetoric of World War III - and either we have the Iranian bomb or we have the bombing of Iran.”]

[The report on Iran followed an inaccurate 2002 assessment by US intelligence of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.]

[”The intelligence services got a lot of blame for the invasion of Iraq that they had exaggerated what they saw ,” Blix said. “This time they do not want to carry the responsibility.”]

8 posted on 12/16/2007 9:55:31 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson