You savage cultists are really brainwashed. You don’t see anything wrong with your cult leader liberal Savage bashing the commander in Chief of the U.S. armed forced in a time of war. And what makes it worse is that liberal Weiner was bashing him every day for years on the war in Iraq. And this liberal traitor Savage (Weiner) was unfairly bashing the generals and Bush on the war in Iraq because as we see their strategy is working and America is winning in Iraq. That’s treason and since you support savage and his bashing of the commander in cheif you obviously don’t support America’s war effort.
Savage has just been bashing Bush on the war in Iraq and other things just to hurt the Republican party, hurt conservatism and to help his liberal/socialist Democrats. This is the same thing the liberal mainstream media has been doing for 7 years Bash Bush to destroy the Republican party and conservatism and help Democrats/socialism advance in AMerica, and it’s worked.
I put up facts and logical arguments . You don’t refute those because you can’t . You just attempt to insult and bash me to discredit my message and to change the subject. Yes I can insult you cult leaders back (it’s the truth anyway you are brainwashed by this liberal con man Wiener/Savage). But at least I provide logical arguments and facts to show savage is a liberal while all you savage supporters do is insult me to change the subject. guess what those ad homiminem attacks don’t bother me and I haven’t changed the subject as I’m still pointing out that Savage is a fake putting on a radio act to make money and to advance his liberalism/communism.
You know what you can do with that .
I put up facts and logical arguments.
You put up your interpretations of such, which you're entitled to. It's not my fault that they're funny as hell.
ad hominen attacks
Where? I mock you because you're easily mocked. Prove an ad hom. attack on my part before using that lie!
You savage cultists are really brainwashed.
Subsequent claim by Rurgan:
I put up facts and logical arguments... all you savage supporters do is insult me to change the subject.... guess what those ad homiminem attacks don’t bother me....
Now, two questions for Rurgan:
1) Do you consider the first sentence to be a fact and a logical argument?
2) Do you consider it to be something other than an ad hominem attack?
3) Do you bother to read the posts to which you reply?
4) Do you feel you are actually accomplishing anything with your hilarious rants? 5) Are you aware that your post proves our posts?
Finally, an assignment for Rurgan:
1) Look up "ad hominem" in the dictionary.
2) Look up "hypocrite" in the dictionary.