[xjcsa]

If the moderator would have given him the time that he needed, he probability would have.

I was hoping she would; the only answer Fred got to give was, "I agree with Alan Keyes' position on global warming." Which was a great answer itself after Keyes' aimless rant.

I have read his Paul Harvey global warming statement; it's brilliant, but I'm not sure he's standing by it. Hope so.

[Prophet in the wilderness]

I didn't watch the debate, only got video clips, but, correct me if I am wrong, but in the exchange with Fred and the moderator, I didn't hear him say that he agreed or was going along with what Keys said.. all I heard was he was not going to raise his hand.
Pardon me if I have to be frank, but, we need to stick with Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter, them 2 will make a great ticket, they are our only clear choice.
I wish there was away I can convince you and persuade you to support Fred and not waver.
I am not happy with the other candidates, I agree with Rush, that out of the top 4, Fred is the only true conservative.

[tarheelswamprat]

I have read his Paul Harvey global warming statement; it's brilliant, but I'm not sure he's standing by it. Hope so.

You stated earlier in this thread that you were previously leaning towards Romney, but would support Thompson provided he unequivocably declared global warming to be a hoax. If this is truly your remaining criterion before making a firm decision, then there is one more question which needs an answer: "Has Romney declared global warming to be a hoax?"

If he has done so, then your line of argument is consistent and honest. If he has not, then there is something else at play, and your argument sounds remarkably like the myriad of "desperately seeking something to object to" posts which pervade these discussions.

Which is it?