Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Worry About Romney, Huckabee
Newsmax ^ | December 13, 2007 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 12/17/2007 1:17:18 AM PST by Tlaloc

Primary season, which appears to have begun about a week after the 2004 presidential elections, is getting sillier with each passing day. This is thanks to the media, which not only feast on the season’s daily menu, but attempt to predigest it for the American people.

As fuzzy as the process of the selection of the two party’s presidential nominees appears to be, the media’s goal is as clear as day: to make it fuzzier and to influence the outcomes.

They do it by attaching great importance to a host of factors that are really meaningless, not the least of which is citing national polls to indicate the front-runners, while carefully ignoring those factors which will decide the outcome.

They know that national polls are worthless indicators of which candidates are probable winners, but that doesn’t stop them from proclaiming that the alleged winners in those polls are the front-runners in the race for their party’s nomination.

Given that false assumption, Rudy Giuliani emerges as the front-runner for the GOP nomination. Primaries, however, are not decided by national polls, they are decided by the voters in the primary states.

Giuliani may be the front-runner in national polls, but he’s barely in the race in such states as Iowa and New Hampshire — the earliest contests where victory goes a long way to indicating which candidates are the likely nominees when the dust clears. And Giuliani himself admits it, pinning his hopes on the states whose primaries come much later and among which he is popular.

When Rudy Giuliani loses in Iowa and when Rudy Giuliani loses in New Hampshire and South Carolina, his standing in the national polls will also plunge.

What is now going on is what’s been going on for decades in presidential primaries — you have all of these leakers leaking information, such as the Drudge Report’s contention that the Democrats want Mike Huckabee to win the GOP nomination because they believe he’d be the easiest Republican to beat in the general election.

Translated, that means that Huckabee really scares the pants off the Democrats, who hope they can prevent him from being the GOP nominee by persuading Republican voters from voting for someone else because Huckabee is a sure loser.

The reality here is that Americans have been electing governors to the presidency for a long time — such men as Roosevelt, Carter, Reagan, Clinton and George W. Bush; and guess what, there are only two former governors running in the GOP primaries, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee.

Based on the record, that fact alone makes either one a probable winner next November. And it’s why the Democrats and their media allies want neither man to win the GOP nomination.

Their front-runners, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, are not governors; they are United States senators, and in modern times the American people simply do not elect senators to the presidency.

Match either one against either Romney or Huckabee, and history teaches us that it’s most probable that the next occupant of the Executive Mansion in Washington will be a former occupant of a governor’s mansion in Arkansas or Massachusetts, and not a United States senator.

Given that fact, doesn’t it defy reason for the Democrats to want to run against Mike Huckabee? Today’s Democrats may be corrupt, not just a little bit slimy. And they are inherently Marxist, but they not stupid, even though Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid make them look that way.

The American people need to be informed about these simple facts, but the media are doing their best to keep the truth from them and manipulate them, especially by attaching great importance to the meaningless national polls.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: huckster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Tlaloc
So ROPO--Reagan On Paper Only--speaks?

The Huckster is no threat to Dems because issue conservatives will stay home and not vote for a liberal liar wrapped up in Bible-speakin'.

41 posted on 12/17/2007 7:18:22 AM PST by newzjunkey (Huckabee, Rudy, Romney: 3 red herrings, 3 easy pickings for Dems in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc
Democrats should be worrying about themselves:

Many of you will recall that on July 8, 1947, almost exactly 60 Years ago, witnesses claim that an unidentified flying object (UFO) with Five aliens aboard crashed onto a sheep and cattle ranch just outside Roswell , New Mexico.

This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered up by the U.S. Air Force and other federal Agencies and organizations.

However, what you may NOT know is that in the month of March 1948, nine months after that historic day, the following people were born:

Albert A. Gore, Jr.

Hillary Rodham

John F. Kerry

William J. Clinton

Howard Dean

Nancy Pelosi

Dianne Feinstein Charles E. Schumer

Barbara Boxer

See what happens when aliens breed with sheep? I certainly hope this bit of information clears up a lot of things for you. It did for me.

42 posted on 12/17/2007 8:03:36 AM PST by fweingart (Life's a bitch. So why vote for one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tompster76
Ironically funny coming from a Mitt supporter there tompster:

Romney also praised McCain for his general reform campaign when the Arizona senator came to Massachusetts to stump with Romney just before Romney's 2002 election victory in the governor's race. "He has always stood for reform and change. And he's always fought the good battle, no matter what the odds," Romney said at the time. "Those are my values."

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070427/REPOSITORY/704270359

Don't even go down the immigration road amigo...

43 posted on 12/17/2007 8:16:17 AM PST by ejonesie22 (In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
Don’t over react, Fred had a good reason for supporting (shutting down the democrats who out gun us on disposable income)

He has since said it was a bad idea, at least as it finally was used and is in favor on simple reporting of activities in a free for all environment.

44 posted on 12/17/2007 8:18:45 AM PST by ejonesie22 (In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

“The reason for this whole “religion” thing is so that the dems can label the GOP as religious wackos —”

If it wasn’t this, it would be something else.

We should not allow the enemy to define who we are.


45 posted on 12/17/2007 9:09:47 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

Thank you for your reply. I still need to understand this better, but you appear to have expressed well his view on this.


46 posted on 12/17/2007 11:44:38 AM PST by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

Yes, if his name is Fred!


47 posted on 12/17/2007 1:44:42 PM PST by RockinRight (Fred Thompson spells gravitas B-A-L-L-S-O-F-S-T-E-E-L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson