To: ricks_place
acting as spoilers rather than providing the leadership the world needs. It's rare that I am in agreement with the NYT. US negotiators should not have gone the the conference in "foot dragging mode." Rather they sould not hove gone to the conference at all.
7 posted on
12/17/2007 4:20:13 AM PST by
stevem
To: stevem
If these “Man Made Global Warming” folks are going to get anything out of their agenda, they better hurry. Science is showing them wrong more and more. Worse, the data for the last several years suggests that the global climate is no longer warming and may actually be cooling. If they don’t get their socialist, anti-capitolism agenda pushed and accepted globally soon, it will be rejected completely. A lot of jobs will be lost.
Here is to still needing a coat in the winter.
9 posted on
12/17/2007 4:26:14 AM PST by
Tenacious 1
(I put my foot in my mouth once. I think I'll just leave it there, lest it happen again.)
To: stevem
I disagree...
I think they should have gone and done more to “drag their feet” including keeping their “NO” vote rather than appearing to have “backed down”.
This just allows the communists to say that they can bully us to their position. That was a mistake, imho...but it was not a mistake to try to derail the talks if thats what could have happened.
We weren’t going to “win” no matter what we did....unless we fully capitulated and groveled for forgivness[like we will if the dumbles win the presidency].
28 posted on
12/17/2007 5:40:58 AM PST by
Adder
(hialb)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson