Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite
Don't think so. Fred and Mitt, while far less than entusiastic than Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo about enforcing the borders and not giving this country away to illegal aliens, at least did not actively support and encourage the open borders lobby.

I could vote for either Fred and Mitt without a clothespin on my nose. I couldn't vote for the Huckster even with a clothespin on my nose.

The Ball Street Journal's position on illegal aliens is well known: keep importing people from the third world so the middle class doesn't get too uppidy about serving the ruling class and is forced to subsidize cheap labor for their betters . . . and compete with it.

6 posted on 12/17/2007 9:01:11 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
Fred and Mitt, while far less than entusiastic than Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo about enforcing the borders

To clearify a little here. Tank and Hunter - while talking a lot about the issue - have not had much opportunity to act on the issue. Mitt, on the other hand, vetoed instate tuition for illegals and opposed drivers licenses - making it practically impossible for them to become available in MA. He also ordered the state police to co-operate in deporting illegals.

While he initially made some favorable statements about the direction of the immigration reform bill, he has always favored a secure-the-border first policy and has affirmed that there will be zero amnesty under his adminstration.

24 posted on 12/17/2007 10:48:44 AM PST by mbraynard (Tagline changed due to admin request)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson