Skip to comments.
Global ocean temperatures "plunge"
from data gathered by the National Climatic Data Center ^
| 12/17/07
| Dangus
Posted on 12/17/2007 11:43:27 AM PST by dangus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221 next last
To: dangus
This is actually proof that the ice caps are melting. Lot of very cold water off Greenland now which is affecting the Gulf stream. If the Gulf Stream is slowed or stopped all together, expect a mini Ice Age in Europe.
To: Eternal_Bear
And get very short the Euro!
22
posted on
12/17/2007 12:03:38 PM PST
by
SAJ
To: dangus
Dang that Bush and Cheney...They’re doing this just to get Big Oil back on top again!!!
23
posted on
12/17/2007 12:03:50 PM PST
by
ICE-FLYER
(God bless and keep the United States of America)
To: dangus
Oh No!
It's GLOBAL WARMING!
It's GLOBAL COOLING!
It's Global Warming...
It's Global Cooling!!
24
posted on
12/17/2007 12:05:57 PM PST
by
Bon mots
To: Eternal_Bear
“This is actually proof that the ice caps are melting. Lot of very cold water off Greenland now which is affecting the Gulf stream. If the Gulf Stream is slowed or stopped all together, expect a mini Ice Age in Europe.”
Good point. The bottom line is this, we are insignificant and can’t change what the earth is doing, learn from the dinosaurs, adapt or die.
25
posted on
12/17/2007 12:07:30 PM PST
by
brownsfan
(America has "jumped the shark")
To: bvw
In 1996 Nature Magazine showed how a new ice age was forming and that it would be far more destructive then warming. If you get carbon credits for heating, what will Al Gore sell for cooling? Ice cubes?
26
posted on
12/17/2007 12:07:34 PM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Bon mots
To: dangus
28
posted on
12/17/2007 12:08:54 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Always Right
Fear-mongers have been using the power of exponential growth curves to scare the masses for centuries. Centuries? Exponential? I'm not sure I agree with the adjectives and nouns in the sentence, but the idea is correct.
29
posted on
12/17/2007 12:10:06 PM PST
by
Jemian
To: JamesP81
“Algore will be deeply saddened, of course.”
No problem, he’ll just switch to selling carbon debits.
30
posted on
12/17/2007 12:12:46 PM PST
by
dblshot
To: dangus
Funny thing is there’s a thread on DU right now claiming the oceans are heating up and causing walrus stampedes.
Even funnier is one DUmmie’s theory that it’s cruise ship engines that are heating up the oceans.
31
posted on
12/17/2007 12:15:14 PM PST
by
VirginiaConstitutionalist
(Hold on, Hank Williams, Jr. I am not yet adequately prepared for some football.)
To: dangus
Global Ocean Temperatures "plunge" Oh Great, Now we're not going to die! ... Man, what a bummer. ... We're gonna have to keep fightin' these stupid libs here on earth.
32
posted on
12/17/2007 12:17:42 PM PST
by
TexGuy
To: pabianice
You're not going to get 40 tons of CO2 out of 1200 pounds of jet fuel. You would probably get a little under 2 tons.
33
posted on
12/17/2007 12:19:39 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
To: dangus
They should have realized how good we had it with GW and left it alone.
Who among us would rather fry than freeze?
34
posted on
12/17/2007 12:20:37 PM PST
by
wolfcreek
(The Status Quo Sucks!)
To: edcoil
In 1996 Nature Magazine showed how a new ice age was forming and that it would be far more destructive then warming. It's a little hard to see how the present civilization will survive with major financial centers like London and New York under or very near the edge of the ice. A lot of farmland would be useless too.
The alarmists claim elevated CO2 levels will turn off whatever causes the glacial cycles. If true, that would be great news for mankind, but I'd bet a Ruth's Chris dinner it's not.
To: NeoCaveman
Notice how they’ve stopped using the phrase “global warming”, and the new phrase is “climate change”? They’re now covered whichever way the data goes
To: dangus
Question: Am I supposed to be happy or angry or concerned or what?
The global warming nutz have me so confused anymore. :(
37
posted on
12/17/2007 12:24:02 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
To: PapaBear3625
Notice how theyve stopped using the phrase global warming, and the new phrase is climate change? Theyre now covered whichever way the data goesI did notice that but I wonder how they are going to demonize CO2, the stuff I exhale, for making us all freeze.....
38
posted on
12/17/2007 12:24:27 PM PST
by
NeoCaveman
("The most expensive thing we pay for is ignorance" - El Rushbo)
To: KarlInOhio
You may be right, but you'd also get trillions of tons of air with an extremely slightly elevated carbon dioxide concentration.
39
posted on
12/17/2007 12:25:20 PM PST
by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: TNoldman
It appears to me that such a minor change might be well within the normal measuring error. Perhaps. I'm not sure how they measured this but I suspect methods superior to those in the earlier 20th century. Thus if we can't trust these new methods for a .25 degree change, we probably can't trust older methods calibrated against newer ones with a .5 degree change. This would leave us uncertain if the planet has warmed this century at all.
40
posted on
12/17/2007 12:26:16 PM PST
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson