[JerseyHighlander]

lormand wants everyone banned.
He can not rationally discuss ANY topic.
Remove Ron Paul from the equation here, and lormand pulls every trolling technique out of his hat, with the picture of him sitting next to JimRob as his Coup de grâce whenever lormand is called out for trolling the Republican Liberty Caucus contigent on FR.

I’ve gone so far as to never respond to the guy, he is simply a partisan bulldog, the kind that isn’t worth the time to converse with on a internet forum, even if the forum is otherwise worth the time to post on. Nothing wrong with partisan bulldogs, but he uses the appeal to authority trolling technique so often as to look pathetic to long time freepers, no matter which side of the primary candidates people are on, and no matter what the issue.

So, to the rest of the people who read this, go click his nick and go back and read his posting history. Make your own decision on his intentions on posting on FR.

Trolling is now a blood sport.

Jim, I might as well preemptively make you aware of this post. Sorry to bother you over something this trivial.

[trisham]

lormand wants everyone banned. He can not rationally discuss ANY topic. Remove Ron Paul from the equation here, and lormand pulls every trolling technique out of his hat, with the picture of him sitting next to JimRob as his Coup de grâce whenever lormand is called out for trolling the Republican Liberty Caucus contigent on FR.

**************************

And yet you are the one who pinged Jim Robinson. Ironic, isn't it?

[jrooney]

Lormand is a patriotic freeper that supports the troops and the war and has not been pushing Paul that would surrender the WOT to al Qaeda putting all of us in danger (I take that personally), like you have and the other Paulnuts. You have been pushing Paul here on FR and FR itself does not support him. IMO anyone that supports this surrender monkey is no better than a troll. I can understand lormand’s anger towards Paul supporters here because I feel the same.

[bcsco]

Smearing someone because he doesn’t agree with you and sees no reason for PaulBots to exist on a forum that rejects his candidacy.

Frankly, the points with which you try to smear lormand better fit you PaulBots.

[lormand]

"the kind that isn’t worth the time to converse with on a internet forum..."

Yet you take the time to throw this hissy fit?

I'm honored.

There are rules about what kind of people who have accounts here. When one crosses into the Cindy Sheehan realm of politics, then it's reasonable to expect a severe zotting. Sometimes I see it work, sometimes not.

If you agree with Ron Paul and his blaming of America, then you too should be lucky to have an account here.

But I'm not worth the time right?