Worth signing in to read the full article. It has many elements of the Duke rape hoax — the lab technician who made the fake report didn’t exist, the prosecutor ignored the actual report because it didn’t help her case, then refused the defense attorney’s request for the file, etc.
Oh, and the perjury? His boss describes it as “an honest mistake”.
Oops I forgot about the “victim”: the D.A. relied exclusively on her testimony, which was, as in the Duke rape hoax, full of contradictions and changed in various retellings, including a claim soon proven false that another woman had been raped as well.
--at least it wasn't one of those "wrong address" SWAT team situations where somebody got killed---