Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Solar cells of the future
EurekAlert ^ | 2007-12-05 | Martin Aagesen

Posted on 12/18/2007 10:17:08 AM PST by crazyshrink

A new material, nano flakes, may revolutionise the transformation of solar energy to electricity. If so, even ordinary households can benefit from solar electricity and save money in the future.

If researcher Martin Aagesen’s future solar cells meet the expectations, both your economy and the environment will benefit from the research. Less than 1 per cent of the world’s electricity comes from the sun because it is difficult to transform solar energy to electricity. But Martin Aagesen’s discovery may be a huge step towards boosting the exploitation of solar energy.

- We believe that the nano flakes have the potential to convert up to 30 per cent of the solar energy into electricity and that is twice the amount that we convert today, says Martin Aagesen who is a PhD from the Nano-Science Center and the Niels Bohr Institute at University of Copenhagen. During his work on his PhD thesis, Martin found a new and untried material.

- I discovered a perfect crystalline structure. That is a very rare sight. While being a perfect crystalline structure we could see that it also absorbed all light. It could become the perfect solar cell, says Martin Aagesen. The discovery of the new material has sparked a lot of attention internationally and has led to an article in Nature Nanotechnology.

- The potential is unmistakeable. We can reduce the solar cell production costs because we use less of the expensive semiconducting silicium in the process due to the use of nanotechnology. At the same time, the future solar cells will exploit the solar energy better as the distance of energy transportation in the solar cell will be shorter and thus lessen the loss of energy, says Martin Aagesen who is also director of the company SunFlake Inc. that pursues development of the new solar cell.

Link to Nature Nanotechnology article


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: energy; solar

1 posted on 12/18/2007 10:17:10 AM PST by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

I saw something like this on the discovery channel a while back. Interesting stuff that could revolutionize the solar power industry if it can be economically produced on any kind of scale.


2 posted on 12/18/2007 10:27:02 AM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Paint your house and car with solar cells. Interesting concept.


3 posted on 12/18/2007 10:37:23 AM PST by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

You wouldn’t need to cover that much area due to the fact that they’re so efficient at collecting solar energy.


4 posted on 12/18/2007 10:45:26 AM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Flakes that absorb all energy?

We’ve all had an ex-girlfriend like that.


5 posted on 12/18/2007 10:46:41 AM PST by agere_contra (Do not confuse the wealth of nations with the wealth of government - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Let me guess! It is 10-15 years away from any marketable application.

For all the ‘incredible breakthroughs’ in the alternative energy movements that I have read recently that are ‘10 years’ away from any practical application, I wish I had a dime for everyone. I will say that if these 10 year promises come true, i will love to tell my current electric company to go eff itself.


6 posted on 12/18/2007 10:49:50 AM PST by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink
...expensive semiconducting silicium

Silicon.

I hope you retyped this.

7 posted on 12/18/2007 10:51:13 AM PST by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Nano-nano. Perhaps Mork knew what he was talking about after all.


8 posted on 12/18/2007 10:52:15 AM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

I believe those flakes absorb money.


9 posted on 12/18/2007 11:41:24 AM PST by ScottyinTN (Stuck on dialup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hayzo
It’s that way with fusion as well. That’s been 20 years away from break-even for the last 40 years. We’ve got LWR technology available here and now that can produce prodigious amounts of electricity with zero emissions essentially on-demand (unlike solar). That is the way we should be going. For the annual cost of the food stamps program we could build 15 baseload nuclear plants each year. At that rate, within the span of a single generation we could triple the nuclear capacity of the country.
10 posted on 12/18/2007 11:54:01 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hayzo
Let me guess! It is 10-15 years away from any marketable application.

Possibly, but remember, there is technology available today that was only reported about 10 or 15 years ago. I'd love to be able to live off the grid, and if it takes 10 or 15 years, that's fine with me. That means the much of our Social Security and retirement savings wouldn't have to go to the electric company. ;o)

11 posted on 12/18/2007 12:05:47 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

I dunno. There’s a lot of missing info in the article. For example, how will the “crystalline” cells be mass produced? What is their life expectancy and how will they perform in different conditions? (e.g., will they melt if subjected to rain or high temperatures?)

How comparable are these nano flakes to thin-film technology, which can be mass produced using well-known manufacturing processes?

Still, am glad there’s another option for photovoltaics out there.


12 posted on 12/18/2007 12:24:12 PM PST by Edward Watson (Fanatics with guns beat liberals with ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“We’ve all had an ex-girlfriend like that.”

I’ve got a soon to be ex-wife like that.


13 posted on 12/18/2007 12:48:13 PM PST by east1234 (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

For the past few years, it seems everyone “in the know” have been quietly freakin out over the possibility of an EMP attack that would render our entire electronic infrastructure usless. I wonder if this would react in the same manner to an EMP? I’m not near smart enough or informed on this matter to know to form an opinion. What do you think?


14 posted on 12/18/2007 1:07:15 PM PST by camerongood210 (Only the dead have seen the end of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson