It if the very first time on this entire thread that the word "peripheral" is used. It was used by me.
You did NOT point out the word "peripheral" to me. It was a word that I used, and it has been part of my argument all along.
Among those peripheral folks are the 88 who posted the entire page ad. I already pointed out to you that they are mentioned in the suit and that it is found in the lawsuit in Cause of Action #4, (5)(e).
You really need to pay attention.
And you really need to apologize for calling me a liar. You can look it up in the lawsuit, and you will find it exactly as I have maintained all along.
Then why did you question it? Recall that you asked: Peripheral players was my claim?
____________________________
Among those peripheral folks are the 88 who posted the entire page ad. I already pointed out to you that they are mentioned in the suit and that it is found in the lawsuit in Cause of Action #4, (5)(e).
1. Mentioning their ad in the suit is different from being a defendant. The 88 ARE NOT defendants in the lawsuit. Get it yet?
2. Now having said that, it is nonsense to maintain that the 88 were peripheral players. They received national publicity and inflamed the mob. It is simply not a credible statement.
3. You said that only the brain dead believed the accuser when the DNA results were published. I ask you: Do you think that the 88 actually believed the accuser's story after the DNA came back? Do the 87 who have not recanted STILL believe it, in your opinion? Remember: your claim was peripheral players who believed the accuser, so don't ignore the question.
And you really need to apologize for calling me a liar.
Stop lying about what I said. I asked if you were lying about a dubious claim that you ignored repeated challenges to retract or support.
Now you apologize.