Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: History’s verdict on Bush will ‘not be kind’
The Hill ^ | December 18, 2007 | Klaus Marre

Posted on 12/18/2007 11:50:53 AM PST by mdittmar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: mdittmar

61 posted on 12/18/2007 12:59:11 PM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Hussein SPEAKS!


62 posted on 12/18/2007 1:03:29 PM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Obama won’t even be a blip in history.


63 posted on 12/18/2007 1:05:54 PM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Ah. Well, now that makes sense.


64 posted on 12/18/2007 1:07:47 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triagle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
...because they will certainly try to ramp up their efforts in order to embarrass Bush and the Republicans before the election.

Seems this would backfire. After 9-11 Bush had an astronomical approval rating. Heck, left-wing nuts got so bitter about his popularity they coined the term "neo-con" to describe those who became conservative overnight. And today, they have evolved this bitterness into a delusional array of "it was all an inside job" conspiracy theories.

No, when America gets hammered they wake up and want a conservative in office.

65 posted on 12/18/2007 1:23:07 PM PST by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Obama

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

66 posted on 12/18/2007 1:27:18 PM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

One Hussein deserves another eh, Barry Obama?


67 posted on 12/18/2007 1:31:19 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar


Roy, this young whippersnapper is gonna get us all killed ...
68 posted on 12/18/2007 1:36:17 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

Edwards...


69 posted on 12/18/2007 1:43:22 PM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I’d like to know what countries W hasn’t talked to ? (not that I think we need to talk to every country)

Sheesh, we’ve even talked to Iran, the last country I’d honor with a visit from ANY American official.


70 posted on 12/18/2007 1:47:30 PM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Our President, GW Bush, is one of the greatest American presidents in history. I rank them like this: Lincoln, Washington, Reagan, GW Bush.

He has conquered 2 Islamic nations and led the foundation for democracy and peace in the Mid-East. No Democrat president, has ever met the greatness of GW Bush’s accomplishments.


71 posted on 12/18/2007 1:51:15 PM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

I grew up there. I can remember him being called a Saber-rattler and boy was his visit to the graveyard near Bittburg a big deal to them (Some former SS soldiers were buried there as well). Of course he was labeled as a stupid “cowboy” and “actor.” Ronald Reagan represented everything they as a society can’t come to grips with: globalization and free trade, freedom isn’t free and needs defended, the right to bear arms, Americas leadership role in the West, the concept of free-men and personal culpability, and that a moral compass in leadership is necessary. From nukes in Germany to the bombing of Libya, Iran, and Stingers to Afghanistan; allowing a free floating exchange rate between the DM and dollar to deregulation of airlines; from the right to bear arms to the death penalty; for the German even if Ronald Reagan is personally more to credit for their own freedom and unification than any other individual German or American, they simply can’t fathom why. It is beside them why someone would vote for him, why anyone would like him, even today. In fact, collectively the Germans don’t give him credit for much and he’s more or less faded from their collective consciousness. His thinking is so far beside their paradigm they simply can’t accept him. To the socialist, those advocating pacifist/appeasement in face of an adversary may that be the Communists or today radical Islam, to those secular minded people who substitute God with government cheese programs, those who are willing to limit freedom for the “collective good,” and seeking a solution to every problem with another subsidy or government program, it is impossible to give credit to a Reagan which is essentially their antithesis.

There is a reason why in Poland and Hungary busts and statues of Reagan are erected in parks and public squares:

http://www.budapestweek.com/index2.html
http://gophub.com/story.php?title=Poland_Honors_Reagans_Defeat_of_Communism

There is a reason why in Germany you won’t hear anything about him anymore.


72 posted on 12/18/2007 1:59:32 PM PST by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

If I could meet president Bush in person, I would have 4 words for him, “Thank you Mr. President”.

If I could meet Dumbo ears in person, I would have 2 words for him, “—— —”.


73 posted on 12/18/2007 2:09:03 PM PST by Gator113 (My short list..Fred, Hunter, Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Fortunately history does not act at the behest of wet-behind-the-ear ignoramuses. If it did Obama would find himself in a very long line.

But Obama also criticized his main opponents for the Democratic nomination for helping start the Iraq war.

Obama evidently thinks the war started in 2003. It didn't, it started in 1990 when his namesake invaded Kuwait. Nothing that happened since happened in a vacuum, which is where his brain has evidently been residing all that time.

Bush isn't worried about history's verdict. History didn't elect him.

74 posted on 12/18/2007 2:17:23 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Obama does not sound very convincing here, and he may find it prudent to let "the war" go as an issue. As progress continues and the war disappears from the news, it will fade from the average person's attention. By next summer it may be close to being successfully wrapped up, with violence at a low ebb and troops coming home in goodly numbers.
75 posted on 12/18/2007 2:44:12 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
As progress continues and the war disappears from the news, it will fade from the average person's attention.

And FR will be here to remind everyone what the democrat traitors tried to do to our Troops.

76 posted on 12/18/2007 3:16:57 PM PST by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson