Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. General Assembly Adopts Death Penalty Moratorium
LA Times via New York Sun ^ | December 19, 2007 | Maggie Farley

Posted on 12/19/2007 5:27:41 AM PST by period end of story

The U.N. General Assembly adopted a moratorium on the death penalty yesterday, overcoming opposition from America, China, and others that argued each nation should be able to choose how to combat crime.

The 104–54 vote for suspending executions is not legally binding but represents a growing global trend against a punishment that many countries say undermines human rights, is a questionable deterrent and mistakenly has killed innocent people.

"There is no conclusive evidence of the death penalty's deterrence value and that any miscarriage or failure of justice in the death penalty's implementation is irreversible and irreparable," the proponents said in the resolution adopted by the 192-nation assembly. There were 29 abstentions.

Attempts in 1994 and 1999 to have the General Assembly adopt a moratorium on the death penalty failed. But since then, the number of countries that have abolished capital punishment in law or practice has grown to 133, according to Amnesty International.

"Today's vote represents a bold step by the international community," Secretary-General Ban said. "This is further evidence of a trend towards ultimately abolishing the death penalty."

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: capitalpunishment

1 posted on 12/19/2007 5:27:43 AM PST by period end of story
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: period end of story

It’s really time to send these idiots packing.


2 posted on 12/19/2007 5:29:58 AM PST by snowman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story

Killing criminals after a trial manages to get the attention of the U.N., but killing your own citizens garners barely a whimper there and will probably get your ambassadors on prestigious committee seats.


3 posted on 12/19/2007 5:30:36 AM PST by chrisser (Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between “conservation” and the neutron bomb.”- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
There is no conclusive evidence of the death penalty's deterrence value"

Except 100% of those put to death never commit another crime.

4 posted on 12/19/2007 5:32:26 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story

Slavery, terrorism, & extortion remain A-OK to the UN.


5 posted on 12/19/2007 5:35:22 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
"There is no conclusive evidence of the death penalty's deterrence value...

Actually, we have no business punishing one person to impact the behavior of another. The death penalty is the appropriate punishment for murderers.

6 posted on 12/19/2007 5:37:50 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
>There is no conclusive evidence of the death penalty's deterrence value

LOL!! After escaping from multiple jails in different states, Ted Bundy came to Florida.

He will never savagely murder our children again

7 posted on 12/19/2007 5:39:09 AM PST by bill1952 (The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story

Yet more reason we do not want the UN running the world.


8 posted on 12/19/2007 5:41:29 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
“There is no conclusive evidence of the death penalty’s deterrence value”

So, if death is no deterrent then what kind of deterrent is 3 squares a day and a warm room?

Is the deterrent concept a thing of the past? Are we now supposed to provide incentives and positive reinforcement for people who see no value in life and the laws of society?

9 posted on 12/19/2007 5:43:53 AM PST by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
The death penalty is the appropriate punishment for murderers.

Yep.

You kill someone (or more than one) and it's proven in a court of law, with the appropriate appeals etc., then you forfeit your right to live.

10 posted on 12/19/2007 5:44:03 AM PST by period end of story (You need cooling, baby I'm not fooling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
Meanwhile, in Huntsville...


11 posted on 12/19/2007 5:45:11 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story

So?


12 posted on 12/19/2007 5:45:16 AM PST by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story

So? The UN wants us to eliminate the death penalty?

Meanwhile back at the execution chamber: NEXT!


13 posted on 12/19/2007 5:46:44 AM PST by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

So....it’s time to give the UN the death penalty...


14 posted on 12/19/2007 5:47:04 AM PST by period end of story (You need cooling, baby I'm not fooling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: period end of story

New Jersey going world-wide?

I can live without the death penalty, if the alternative makes the perp WISH for death. My proposed solution is spelled out in my FReeper profile.


15 posted on 12/19/2007 5:52:16 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Blankets?

You’re too kind.


16 posted on 12/19/2007 5:55:54 AM PST by period end of story (You need cooling, baby I'm not fooling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
The 104–54 vote for suspending executions is not legally binding ....... - The UN is not legally binding. They could outlaw gravity with equal effect.
17 posted on 12/19/2007 6:03:23 AM PST by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson