Why not?
1) Fred's standing in the polls has been consistently higher than Hunters;
2) An endorsement of Hunter would add nothing statistically poll-wise to Hunter's campaign;
3) Tancredo's buddy, Steve King has endorsed Fred; was that the first act?
4) Fred's standing on immigration, Tancredo's single hot-button issue, has been consistently conservative.
I see no reason not to.
Bingo...
Think Exon Amendment 2525
I agree, Tancredo should endorse Fred Thompson!
I don’t even know who Steve King is. If he is a celebrity or one of those rich fellas; so what. This is what is wrong with the elections today.
It’s all about who can appear to be a good candidate and what endorsements they can get which mean nothing anymore.
Later we find out there is no meat to the pie.
2) An endorsement of Hunter would add nothing statistically poll-wise to Hunter's campaign;
Actually it would about double Hunter's support.
3) Tancredo's buddy, Steve King has endorsed Fred; was that the first act?
It was a rather backhanded endorsement.
4) Fred's standing on immigration, Tancredo's single hot-button issue, has been consistently conservative.
Is that a joke? Thompson opposed holding companies responsible for knowingly hiring criminal aliens. Thompson also supported increased chain migration of legal immigrants and opposes English being the official language.