Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
I refer you to my #166.

"Special treatment" doesn't have to be of a sexual nature, you know.

Not saying it isn't, just that it doesn't have to be.

180 posted on 12/20/2007 11:32:10 AM PST by JennysCool (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: JennysCool
Dear JennysCool,

I refer you to #171:

“At this point, it’s just speculation.”

and:

“But here’s the hint...”[emphasis added]

In that working with lobbyists is inherently a form of special treatment, and one that is hardly the stuff of scandal, one must ask the question, what’s the big deal?

Maybe there is none. But that rather leaves wanting an explanation for the fact that Mr. McCain has apparently hired Mr. Bennett.

If all this were about a lobbyist helping to write a piece of legislation that wasn’t even passed, I think that Mr. McCain would be chuckling at the feebleness of the attempt to smear him.

We’ll see what comes of this, but as far as speculations go, sex scandal is at least as good as any.


sitetest

182 posted on 12/20/2007 11:37:54 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson