To: RandallFlagg
it may be sad, but if I for one prefer not to have to smell it or breathe it in
27 posted on
12/20/2007 4:51:57 PM PST by
RDTF
(Remember Pearl Harbor)
To: RDTF
Then patronize establishments that don’t permit it, as opposed to supporting government intrusion on private business decisions.
41 posted on
12/20/2007 5:54:36 PM PST by
Gabz
(Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
To: RDTF
it may be sad, but if I for one prefer not to have to smell it or breathe it in It may be sad, but I for one, prefer you to pound sand.
To: RDTF
it may be sad, but if I for one prefer not to have to smell it or breathe it inThen go to a non-smoking restaurant.
Last I checked, tobacco was a legal product and restaurants were private property. Tell me why a restaurant owner shouldn't be allowed to decide whether or not he will allow his patrons to use a legal product.
68 posted on
12/20/2007 7:31:24 PM PST by
brewcrew
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson