Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jern

Why do I think that if this article was about Fred having any kind of chance it would be getting more positive reviews? :)

I like a lot of things about Fred and I’m definitely not overwhelmed by Huck, but I think those people who are still convinced Fred is going to turn this thing his way are delusional.

In many ways, I would like to be wrong... but I don’t think I am. Time will tell.

At least everyone is now on record here! We can all check back in a few months and see who really knows what they’re talking about! :)

The funny thing to me—and no one can say Buchanan is wrong about this!—Mitt should be doing much better given all the money he has spent. That his numbers aren’t higher are shocking.

Anybody else at least agree with that?


27 posted on 12/20/2007 8:15:20 PM PST by Mighty_Quinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mighty_Quinn

“Mitt should be doing much better given all the money he has spent. That his numbers aren’t higher are shocking.”

Let’s see how the voting goes, primary voters are notoriously hard to poll accurately.

Fred either surprises in Iowa or he is in big trouble. He needs a strong third or better.

I think it is still a 4 man race, but it will compress pretty quickly once the voting starts.


28 posted on 12/20/2007 8:41:47 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Fred Thompson's Federalism is right on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn

“I think those people who are still convinced Fred is going to turn this thing his way are delusional.”

“You gotta believe!”
Tug McGraw, of the 1973 NY Mets


49 posted on 12/21/2007 10:17:51 AM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson