So you are of the opinion that the Commerce Clause can mean anything they want it to mean? That's some pretty effed up thinking right there. And the Debates are relevant as they give us the Const Convention and 1St Congress' thoughts on what they meant.
Docs with licenses issued per state legislative acts and judges, per state constitutions and legislative statutes and rules.
Sounds like State powers, not Feds.
Irrelevant. The imaginative possibilities presented in fiction do not apply to actual law. Actual law must be judged on it's merits.
So you are ignorant of history as well. How nice...
Yeah, try to do that and quit advocating that mental cases have access to the legitimate firearms market.
Quit trying to give the FedGov power over what standard is used to disqualify people from exercizing a Right.
No, logic applies.
"Quit trying to give the FedGov power over what standard is used to disqualify people from exercizing a Right."
You just said, "Sounds like State powers, not Feds", regarding the determination of mental illness. Which is what I said. So ponder your own words: "That's some pretty effed up thinking right there."
Re: The imaginative possibilities presented in fiction do not apply to actual law. Actual law must be judged on it's merits.
"So you are ignorant of history as well. How nice...
History is not a logical operation that applies figments of the imagination to any actual law.