You really see no down side to this? You continue to dismiss original intent and stated goals for the Constitution and the limits it imposes, and you actually see this expansion of government power as being covered by the Commerce Clause despite the logical evidence against it...
You aren't worth discussing this then. You seem to have a personal stake in it that cannot be countered by logic, facts, or reason.
No.
"You really see no down side to this?"
There is no down side.
"You continue to dismiss original intent and stated goals for the Constitution and the limits it imposes,
No, I just don't think you have a firm grasp of the matter.
"and you actually see this expansion of government power as being covered by the Commerce Clause despite the logical evidence against it...
It is covered and justified by the Commerce Clause, as per original intent.
"You aren't worth discussing this then. You seem to have a personal stake in it that cannot be countered by logic, facts, or reason."
Sure thing... As if allowing the possession and sale of firearms to psychotics, those adjudicated a danger to self, or others, violent felons, enemies of the US and those dishonorably discharged from the Armed Forces of the US is logically justified. Religion of Pieces clerics have a right to nukes too, I suppose.