[fishtank]

Both Rice and the Huckster are wrong on foreign policy. Condi Rice is busy destroying the nation of Israel, but has time to respond to a foreign policy newbie (the Huck).

[OCCASparky]

Condi Rice is busy destroying the nation of Israel

How so? By calling for the formation of a Palistinian state? Acutally, I think it's brilliant. The Palies and the rest of the Islamists (as well as Israel) know damned well that they can't set their hate aside long enough to form their own nation if it means learning to live in peace with Israel.

It's essentially Condi calling their bluff and knowing the Palies are going to fold.

[iopscusa]

May they both lose...Rice and the Huckster are wrong on foreign policy, that’s the truth!

[cowdog77]

Both Rice and the Huckster are wrong on foreign policy. Condi Rice is busy destroying the nation of Israel, but has time to respond to a foreign policy newbie (the Huck).”
___________________________

She’s better received by the MSM here than the chauvinistic mullah’s/sultans of the Middle East....she needs to stick closer to home (and the State Department).

[wardaddy]

I am with you Fish.........the Condi club here hasn’t ever bothered to read the fine print.

They see “black”....”female”...oh goody

if she was a white guy from Alabama she’d be diddly....unless she were Jeff Sessions.....now that is almost a real conservative

remember all the Condi for POTUS folks here a few years back....that’s a hoot

[wardaddy]

to be fair....she beats Colin Powell though

[antisocial]

The ‘Day of the Lord’ (YHVH) is a major topic in the Bible. It is the MAJOR subject of the book of Isaiah. The book of Joel mentions the “Day of the Lord” in Joel 1:15, Joel 2:1. The book of Zephaniah mentions the “Day of the Lord” in Zephaniah 1:14-15. The book of Zechariah mentions the “Day of the Lord” in Zechariah 14:1. The book of Obadiah mentions the “Day of the Lord” in Obadiah 1:15.

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE MAJOR EVENTS OF THE DAY OF THE LORD?

#1) In the day of the Lord (Zeph 1:14-15), Gaza will be forsaken

#2) In the day of the Lord (Joel 2:1), the land of Israel will be divided by the nations (Joel 3:2)
#3) In the day of the Lord (Zech 14:2), Jerusalem will be divided.

The “enemy” will say that the “mountains of Israel” (West Bank) belongs to them (Ezekiel 36:1-2).

Has anyone noticed that the nations of the world met at Annapolis to divide the land of Israel (Joel 3:2) and the city of Jerusalem (Zech 14:2) ? Does anyone realize that the creation of a PLO state is a “day of the Lord” (tribulation event) ? Does anyone realize that their has been a verbal pledge to create a PLO state by the end of 2008?

#4) In the day of the Lord (Is 13:6), Babylon is destroyed through a confrontation with the Medes (Iran) (Is 13:17).

Has anyone noticed that the Bush administration has suggested the possibility of going to war with Iran over its nuclear development program?

Babylon is destroyed through a confrontation with the Medes (Iran) in the time known as the ‘vengeance of YHVH’ (Jer 51:11) over the ‘controversy of Zion’ (Is 34:8)

#5) In the day of the Lord (Joel 2:1), Jews will be removed from their homes (Joel 3:6)

#6) In the day of the Lord (Zech 14:1), the nations will be judged for dividing Jerusalem (Zech 14:3) and the judgment will be nuclear (Zech 14:12)

Does anyone understand that when the Bush Administration and the USA had pledged to create a PLO state (and thus divide the land of Israel and the city of Jerusalem) that the judgment for doing so is nuclear destruction (Zechariah 14:12).

Does anyone understand that the fate of the USA is SEALED with the pledge to create a PLO state and that fate for the USA is nuclear destruction (Zech 14:12) ?

THE DAY OF THE LORD (YHVH) IS AT HAND

From all these things, you may conclude what you want. However, I am concluding that the “Day of the Lord” is at hand.

I am personally preparing for the distinct possibility that the Bush administration will be successful and force Israel to create a PLO state by the end of 2008.

For those who haven’t heard the recent news, President Bush has announced that he will make his first ever trip to Israel on January 10.

When a USA president needs negoations to be done, he sends his political diplomats (Condolezza Rice). When understandings are reached, the president calls for high-level meetings and summits (Annapolis). The Bush administration has stated that the President’s trip to Israel will be “substantive”. What does this mean? Only time will tell. Do I believe that this visit will result in the signing of a peace agreement? I don’t. Will it lay further groundwork for an eventual peace agreement? I believe so. Is it possible that a peace agreement will be signed in 2008? Based upon the reality of USA politics, I believe that there is a real possibility of a peace agreement to create a PLO during 2008.

[Wiz]

It sounds like red-on-red.