[gonzo]

"...Some American experts are skeptical of Israel’s ability to tackle Iran alone..."

Musta forgot about Israels nuke-tipped Jericho-II's. And if Israel feels that it has to go-it-alone, what's the line on Tehran, Damascus, Riyadh, Mecca, Medina, and maybe Cairo? What-the-hell, toss in Islamabad, too! If Israel has to go alone, I'd bet on them to play to win.

Which is why the USA and President Bush must eliminate the Iranian threat before the 2008 election. A plus is that the defeatocRATS wouldn't stand a chance after we whacked Iran. Americans love a winner, not a whiner .................... FRegards

[plain talk]

Musta forgot about Israels nuke-tipped Jericho-II's. And if Israel feels that it has to go-it-alone, what's the line on Tehran, Damascus, Riyadh, Mecca, Medina, and maybe Cairo? What-the-hell, toss in Islamabad, too! If Israel has to go alone, I'd bet on them to play to win.

I am not following you. Are you suggesting Israel premptively launch nukes against Iran, Eqypt and Saudia Arabia? Is that what you are saying?

[Ancesthntr]

Musta forgot about Israels nuke-tipped Jericho-II's. And if Israel feels that it has to go-it-alone, what's the line on Tehran, Damascus, Riyadh, Mecca, Medina, and maybe Cairo? What-the-hell, toss in Islamabad, too! If Israel has to go alone, I'd bet on them to play to win.

I have no doubt at all that Israel could, if needed, effectively destroy Arab and Iranian culture pretty much everywhere (except in Londonistan and Detroit, since they wouldn't take out those cities).

BUT

We're talking about something a little less drastic than nuking a bunch of cities and starting WW3.