Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stanford's nanowire battery holds 10 times the charge of existing ones
Stanford News Service ^ | 12/18/07 | DAN STOBER

Posted on 12/23/2007, 2:35:38 AM by dangerdoc

Stanford researchers have found a way to use silicon nanowires to reinvent the rechargeable lithium-ion batteries that power laptops, iPods, video cameras, cell phones, and countless other devices.

The new version, developed through research led by Yi Cui, assistant professor of materials science and engineering, produces 10 times the amount of electricity of existing lithium-ion, known as Li-ion, batteries. A laptop that now runs on battery for two hours could operate for 20 hours, a boon to ocean-hopping business travelers.

"It's not a small improvement," Cui said. "It's a revolutionary development."

The breakthrough is described in a paper, "High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires," published online Dec. 16 in Nature Nanotechnology, written by Cui, his graduate chemistry student Candace Chan and five others.

The greatly expanded storage capacity could make Li-ion batteries attractive to electric car manufacturers. Cui suggested that they could also be used in homes or offices to store electricity generated by rooftop solar panels.

"Given the mature infrastructure behind silicon, this new technology can be pushed to real life quickly," Cui said.

The electrical storage capacity of a Li-ion battery is limited by how much lithium can be held in the battery's anode, which is typically made of carbon. Silicon has a much higher capacity than carbon, but also has a drawback.

Silicon placed in a battery swells as it absorbs positively charged lithium atoms during charging, then shrinks during use (i.e., when playing your iPod) as the lithium is drawn out of the silicon. This expand/shrink cycle typically causes the silicon (often in the form of particles or a thin film) to pulverize, degrading the performance of the battery.

Cui's battery gets around this problem with nanotechnology. The lithium is stored in a forest of tiny silicon nanowires, each with a diameter one-thousandth the thickness of a sheet of paper. The nanowires inflate four times their normal size as they soak up lithium. But, unlike other silicon shapes, they do not fracture.

Research on silicon in batteries began three decades ago. Chan explained: "The people kind of gave up on it because the capacity wasn't high enough and the cycle life wasn't good enough. And it was just because of the shape they were using. It was just too big, and they couldn't undergo the volume changes."

Then, along came silicon nanowires. "We just kind of put them together," Chan said.

For their experiments, Chan grew the nanowires on a stainless steel substrate, providing an excellent electrical connection. "It was a fantastic moment when Candace told me it was working," Cui said.

Cui said that a patent application has been filed. He is considering formation of a company or an agreement with a battery manufacturer. Manufacturing the nanowire batteries would require "one or two different steps, but the process can certainly be scaled up," he added. "It's a well understood process."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; silicon; stanford
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
If they can deliver, this will be big.

So what is the wholesale price of lithium these days?

1 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:35:40 AM by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Ping for later


2 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:37:32 AM by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

This one gets a “WOW”... not only will this permit batteries with big-time life, but smaller ones for devices that might not have been able to use batteries before due to size-vs-life constraints. I’d say it’ll be HUGH.


3 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:40:52 AM by alancarp (How many millions have to break a law before it's inconvenient to enforce?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Some real whiz-bang technology here.


4 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:44:04 AM by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

Think I heard on the Kim Komando show today that this would give the battery on your laptop up to 40 hours use before a recharge was necessary.


5 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:44:45 AM by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Of course this would have never have happened if the Democrats did not pass the new Energy Bill. Nancy Pelosi can claim she invented it.


6 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:44:53 AM by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
I wonder if it is possible to grow silicon nano-tubes. It would increase the available surface area.

I also wonder what kind of fires these batteries will generate.

7 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:45:53 AM by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Think I heard on the Kim Komando show today that this would give the battery on your laptop up to 40 hours use before a recharge was necessary.

All she probably did was take the current average for a laptop of about 4 hours and multiply it by 10.

8 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:46:11 AM by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Excellent. Now China can steal the technology and provide the world with it’s in-house designed miracle batteries. Very cool.


9 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:47:26 AM by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Just think how long a hearing aid batter could last.


10 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:50:42 AM by JAKraig (Joseph Kraig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

but will it run my van...?


11 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:53:23 AM by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

The combination of this with recent price breakthroughs in solar power seems quite interesting


12 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:53:45 AM by SauronOfMordor (When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig

What about making a big battery for an electric car. This could solve our energy problems.


13 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:54:07 AM by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
The combination of this with recent price breakthroughs in solar power seems quite interesting

And to think Big Oil is still sitting on that carborator that runs on water.

14 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:55:38 AM by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

LOL!


15 posted on 12/23/2007, 2:56:00 AM by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
"What about making a big battery for an electric car. This could solve our energy problems."

How so? Batteries don't make energy, they just store it. It also takes almost twice as much energy to go a mile in an electric car as a diesel car, due to the high transmission losses involved in the use of electricity.

16 posted on 12/23/2007, 3:06:17 AM by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"And to think Big Oil is still sitting on that carborator that runs on water."

Show some sympathy, ok? How would you like to spend thirty years sitting on a carbuerator?

17 posted on 12/23/2007, 3:08:44 AM by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Maybe if you scotch tape a couple of hundred batteries together....
18 posted on 12/23/2007, 3:14:08 AM by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

bmflr

.

.

.

According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts


19 posted on 12/23/2007, 3:15:00 AM by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
So what is the wholesale price of lithium these days?

As a Big Pharma employee of a company making Lithium tabs and caps, I can tell you that it's CHEAP.

20 posted on 12/23/2007, 3:22:44 AM by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson