Replies

Liberal MSM reporter tells a witness that "you are wrong..MLK was elsewhere" what is the witness supposed to say? Who says MSM reporter with an agenda has it right instead of the witness who actually was there?

Never let FACTS get in your way. If you had bothered to go to the source and read the whole article you'd have found this.....

Romney did show up at a smaller march the following Saturday in the exclusive Grosse Pointe suburb of Michigan to protest housing discrimination. But contemporaneous news reports show that King had left the Michigan area by then, and was traveling in the Northeast. On Friday, June 28, he was in Suffolk, VA, according to an Associated Press report published in the Washington Post. On Saturday, June 29, he addressed an AFL-CIO meeting at Rutgers University in New Jersey, according to the Chicago Tribune. (Cited by the Boston Phoenix here.) He spent the following day in Brooklyn, arriving by car in Harlem on Sunday evening, according to the New York Times.

Yes, but this is not a fact. There are other, conflicting MSM reports from the 1960’s and these 2 independent eye witnesses who say otherwise. Besides, there were plenty of marches and not everything AP or New York Times says is true (or is it?).
Funny how AP and NYT are now the highest authorities if FR.
This is another DNC/MSM attack. They are clearly in panic.

Wall Street Journal:
“Democrats know it. Here’s an interesting statistic: Since the beginning of 2007, the Democratic National Committee has released 102 direct attacks on Mitt Romney. Rudy Giuliani has warranted 78; John McCain 68; Fred Thompson 21.”

Some facts matter, others don't.

That George Romney was a pro-civil rights governor who instilled the same values into his son matters. That he marched in civil rights rallies organized by King and in solidarity with him matters.

Why does it matter whether governor G. Romney and King physically marched together at the same demonstration? And why would it matter whether his son, who was a teenager at the time, correctly or incorrectly remembers such a meaningless, insignificant detail?

Not that I'm conceding that he doesn't remember correctly. It's been by no means been established that G. Romney didn't march with King. Some sources indicate he did, others did not. Frankly, I don't see why anyone should care.

Again, some facts matter, others don't. Why anyone would waste his time on this one is beyond me.