[JCEccles]

It is GREAT news for Romney to be savaged by an ultra-liberal newspaper.

Unlike the FReepers with MDS who will eagerly join the liberal chorus in a rabid denunciation of Mitt, I actually read the Marxist screed in issue. The editorial board was especially offended and outraged that Mitt said he would double the size of Guantanamo and had refused to eliminate waterboarding as means of cracking terrorists with mass murder on their minds.

This kind of rejection is EXACTLY the kind of rejection Mitt or any conservative Republican nominee needs.

How can you not see this is a good thing?

[tompster76]

“Unlike the FReepers with MDS”

yes, the famous “3.2% club”. lol.

[Melinda]

The only way I see this as a bad thing is how it reflects a noticeable change from civil discourse in what was once a great conservative state.

[Jabba the Nutt]

"The editorial board was especially offended and outraged that Mitt said he would double the size of Guantanamo and had refused to eliminate waterboarding as means of cracking terrorists with mass murder on their minds."

Hmmm, maybe I could support Romney.

[DodoDreamer]

I would not call Romney a ‘conservative’. He is a conciliator, who will reach his hand across the aisle and cut deals with the Democrats.

He’s not a ‘liberal’ by any means, but he is well to the Left of George W. Bush.