Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Hoc Anno Domini
OpinionJournal.com ^ | December 24, 1949 | Vermont Royster

Posted on 12/24/2007 6:58:37 AM PST by abb

This editorial was written in 1949 by the late Vermont Royster and has been published annually since.

When Saul of Tarsus set out on his journey to Damascus the whole of the known world lay in bondage. There was one state, and it was Rome. There was one master for it all, and he was Tiberius Caesar.

Everywhere there was civil order, for the arm of the Roman law was long. Everywhere there was stability, in government and in society, for the centurions saw that it was so.

But everywhere there was something else, too. There was oppression--for those who were not the friends of Tiberius Caesar. There was the tax gatherer to take the grain from the fields and the flax from the spindle to feed the legions or to fill the hungry treasury from which divine Caesar gave largess to the people. There was the impressor to find recruits for the circuses. There were executioners to quiet those whom the Emperor proscribed. What was a man for but to serve Caesar?

There was the persecution of men who dared think differently, who heard strange voices or read strange manuscripts. There was enslavement of men whose tribes came not from Rome, disdain for those who did not have the familiar visage. And most of all, there was everywhere a contempt for human life. What, to the strong, was one man more or less in a crowded world?

Then, of a sudden, there was a light in the world, and a man from Galilee saying, Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's.

And the voice from Galilee, which would defy Caesar, offered a new Kingdom in which each man could walk upright and bow to none but his God.

snip

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: caesar; inhocannodomini; jesus; saul; vermontroyster; wsj
This one never grows old...
1 posted on 12/24/2007 6:58:39 AM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb
"And so Paul, the apostle of the Son of Man, spoke to his brethren, the Galatians, the words he would have us remember afterward in each of the years of his Lord:

Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage."

Thanks - and how wonderful it is that our founding fathers took this exact thought to heart when writing the American Constitution. Merry Christmas!

2 posted on 12/24/2007 7:03:06 AM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
And he sent this gospel of the Kingdom of Man into the uttermost ends of the earth.

"Kingdom of Man?" Not.
I'm a regular reader of the OJ, but this turn of phrase sunk the whole editorial.

3 posted on 12/24/2007 7:46:29 AM PST by Churchjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Churchjack

Yeah, it’s really apparent that this author did not really understand the “Gospel” that he was referring to.


4 posted on 12/24/2007 7:53:52 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb
There was the impressor to find recruits for the circuses.

I suspect he is trying to say that people were drafted into the gladiatorial games. If so, he's wrong on several counts.

1. I've never run across the term "impressor" in several decades of reading in Roman history.

2. The gladiatorial games were staffed by prisoners of war, convicted criminals, or in some cases volunteered free men. The Romans didn't go around and grab people off the street.

3. The gladiatorial games were not presented in the Circus, which was for chariot races.

5 posted on 12/24/2007 8:02:50 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

ANYONE, that does not believe that Christ’s spirit lives, need only to look at the life of Paul, the Apostle. After the first four Books, Paul’s writings filled the majority of the New Testament.

Paul, born Saul, of Tarsus, persecuted Christians until that fateful day on the road to Damascus (read Acts, Chapter 9). He soon was not only a follower, but a teacher of God’s new way, through Christ.

Paul, was persecuted for the rest of his life, both by some Christians, who thought him a spy, and by his former Jewish brothers, who thought him a traitor.

His heart was God’s, his path was Jesus’. He spread the Word outside of Israel. Through him, the rest of the world has learned of Jesus’ love and God’s grace, given to each of us, if we only accept the Truth.

May God be with all of us this CHRISTmas season. Jesus IS the reason for the Season.


6 posted on 12/24/2007 8:43:52 AM PST by wizr ("Right now, the burden is all on the American soldiers. Right now, Hope Rides Alone." Sgt. E Jeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Thanks for the post. “In Hoc Anno Domini” and “It’s a Wonderful Life” are my two musts for Christmas.


7 posted on 12/25/2007 10:22:25 AM PST by Kid Shelleen (Aztlan My Azz: La Raza is Spanish for Tan Klan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Can you please elaborate ? Thanks and have a great Christmas and New Year..


8 posted on 12/25/2007 10:25:11 AM PST by Kid Shelleen (Aztlan My Azz: La Raza is Spanish for Tan Klan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb

This is even more poignant,when you realize, in context, it was written just four years removed from a six year world war fought at a tremendous human and economic cost, which ended the tyranny of three totalitarian regimes, and yet now in the shadow of even a larger menace, Communism, which has claimed the Soviet union and, a few months earlier, all of Mainland China.

In the 58 years since, the world has radically changed, but the age old enemies, those who would rob men of their freedom and dignity, and institute new forms of powerful darkness upon them, still remain.

One of them is Hillary Clinton.


9 posted on 12/25/2007 11:06:13 AM PST by exit82 (How do you handle Hillary? You Huma her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
In the 58 years since, the world has radically changed, but the age old enemies, those who would rob men of their freedom and dignity, and institute new forms of powerful darkness upon them, still remain.

One of them is Hillary Clinton.

Word!

10 posted on 12/25/2007 11:13:44 AM PST by null and void (I've always liked Ron Paul, he is not a like a serial rapist. - rovenstinez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

You asked — “Can you please elaborate ? Thanks and have a great Christmas and New Year..”

My statement was (that you asked me to elaborate on) — “Yeah, it’s really apparent that this author did not really understand the “Gospel” that he was referring to.” [in post #4]

In the article, the author is framing the “Gospel” in terms of Caesar, government, oppression, leaders, and even the burning of books. He even tries to frame the Gospel in terms of Jesus’ famous statement, which was given in response to certain Pharisees who were trying to trap him into saying something against the government of Caesar or face the wrath of the people, instead. Jesus’ words are quoted as — “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s and unto God the things that are God’s.”

And then the author says, “And he sent this gospel of the Kingdom of Man into the uttermost ends of the earth.”

Well, look up the phrase, “Kingdom of Man” in the Bible. Nowhere does it occur. But, this author has appropriately named what he is talking about as “the gospel of the Kingdom of Man”. That’s most appropriate, because it’s not the Kingdom of God that Jesus talks about and it’s not the Kingdom of Heaven that is referred to, and it’s not the Kingdom that Jesus says He is king over (and not one on earth, at that time). The author makes up a totally foreign “Gospel of the Kingdom of Man”. No such thing exists in the Bible.

That is not the Gospel.

The Gospel is what we are told in the Bible —

1 Corinthians 15:1-8

1 Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand,

2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.

3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,

4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,

5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve.

6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep.

7 After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles.

8 Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time.

The Gospel was first introduced in the Garden of Eden, immediately at the sin (and judgment of the same) of mankind. The Gospel was initially given there, looking forward to the coming Messiah and the salvation that He offers to the bondage of “sin” under the evil one (Satan). It is expanded and further explained through what we are given through Israel, God’s chosen people and from whom the Messiah will come (for the salvation of the world).

We see that Abraham is saved by faith, in that He believed the promises of God (of the coming Messiah and the payment for sins) and God counted that as righteousness to him. In the same way, we are told we are counted as righteous (the same as Abraham) and also by our further knowledge and understanding after the coming of Jesus and his crucifixion, death, burial and resurrection, having accomplished in full all that God required.

All “according to Scripture” as the Apostle Paul tells us. This is the Gospel, as we are told. It’s not the “gospel of the Kingdom of Man” and neither does it have to do with Caesars or governments or any of those other things in the article.

So, no, the author does not understand the “gospel” he is referring to. He makes up a “different gospel” — one that is not mentioned in the Bible or one that Paul says even if an angel were to tell you different, to ignore him. In this case, we ignore this author as not knowing what he is talking about.

Regards,
Star Traveler


11 posted on 12/27/2007 6:49:08 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Thanks and a blessed New Year’s to you and yours..


12 posted on 12/27/2007 7:11:19 AM PST by Kid Shelleen (Aztlan My Azz: La Raza is Spanish for Tan Klan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Ummm..., one more thing — for this thread. I thought I would add this for posterity’s sake...


December 24, 2007

Dear Star Traveler,

Our office will be closed on the 24th and 25th.
Today’s update is from our archives, the newsletter article from December 1992.

Today’s Update: The Cradle & the Cross
by Dave Hunt

Another Christmas season is here. Why December 25, since it’s unlikely that Jesus was born at this time of year? The Roman Church simply took the Saturnalia, a licentious celebration of the winter solstice dedicated to Saturn, and Christianized it in order to convert pagan Rome. The actual effect was to paganize official Christianity. For example, statues of Isis and Horus were renamed Mary and Jesus so that pagans could continue their idolatry under Christian names. Pagan customs involving vestments, candles, incense, images and processions were incorporated into Church worship and continue today. No authentic history denies these facts.

Would the world, then, be better off without Christmas? Atheists think so and wish to remove all manger scenes and crosses from public places. Rather than joining the enemies of God in denouncing Christmas, however, might we not better cultivate the bits of truth that shine through the lamentable commercialization and paganism? This is a unique time of year for presenting the gospel to the world, so let us take advantage of the opportunity.

Christ’s birth and the details of His life, death and resurrection were foretold centuries before by the Hebrew prophets. No such prophecies preceded the births of Buddha, Confucius, Muhammad, et al. Biblical prophecy fulfilled is the most powerful persuader we have. Paul used it in converting the lost and turned the world of his day upside down. So should we.

In Romans 1:1-4 we see Paul’s approach. He refers to “the gospel of God, (which he [God] had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures).” Christianity is not a first-century invention. It is, in fact, the fulfillment of that which, with one voice, the Hebrew prophets consistently foretold for centuries.

There are more than 300 Messianic prophecies in the Old Testament. Why? So Israel could identify Him, when in the fullness of time God would send forth his Son (Gal 4:4). The third chapter in the Bible contains the first prophecy of the Messiah’s coming, His virgin birth (”the seed of the woman”) and His destruction of Satan (Gn 3:15). The prophets declared that He must be of the “lineage of David” (Jer 23:5; 2 Sm 7:10-16; Ps 89:3-4) and rule upon David’s throne. To prove that Jesus met this criteria, Matthew and Luke begin with the genealogy of Joseph and Mary.

Having rejected Jesus, the Jews still hope for their Messiah to come-but they hope in vain. Jesus Christ fulfilled Malachi 3:1 (”the Lord [Messiah], whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple”) when He cast out the money changers and merchants (Mk 11:15). The destruction of the temple 38 years later in A.D. 70 made it impossible during the last 1,923 years for any would-be Messiah to fulfill that scripture. Moreover, all genealogic records were lost in the destruction of the temple, so a future “Messiah” would not be able to prove the necessary descent from David.

Yes, the temple will soon be rebuilt. Instead of cleansing it, however, as Christ did, Antichrist will defile it with his image and force the world to worship him as God: “he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God” (2 Thes 2:4).

Jacob prophesied, “The sceptre shall not depart from Judah...until Shiloh [Messiah] come...” (Gn 49:10). Shortly after the birth of Jesus, about A.D. 7, the sceptre departed when the Jews lost the right to enforce the death penalty. Thereafter, it was forever too late for Messiah to come. By God’s grace, however, He had already come; and He will come again to rescue at Armageddon those who rejected Him the first time. They will know Him by the marks of Calvary (”they shall look upon me whom they pierced”; Zec 12:10). The sceptre having departed from Judah, Christ, instead of being stoned by the Jews, was executed by the Romans, whose supreme penalty was crucifixion. Thus was fulfilled yet another prophecy: “...they pierced my hands and my feet” (Ps 22:16)!

But back to the cradle. Caesar Augustus had no inkling of the momentous effect of his decree “that all the world should [return to the city of one’s birth to] be taxed” (Lk 2:1). That decree brought Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem in time for the birth of her “firstborn son” (so she had other children) in fulfillment of Micah 5:2: “But thou, Bethlehem...out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel....”

What depth of meaning there is in the simple statement, “when the fulness of time was come, God sent forth his Son” (Gal 4:4)! His birth had to occur before the sceptre departed from Judah; His death, after. His birthplace was determined by a Roman decree; His death and its method of execution, by the Roman occupation of Israel. He had to come before the temple was destroyed and with it the genealogic records.

The “fulness of time” has passed. No one else can meet the Messianic criteria laid down by the Hebrew prophets! That simple phrase, however, carries a much deeper meaning than we have seen above. If the timing of His birth causes us to marvel, the timing of Christ’s death is even more precise and full of meaning. Daniel prophesied the very day of His death.

Through the writings of Jeremiah, Daniel learned that the Babylonian captivity would last 70 years (Dn 9:2). God had commanded that each seven years the Hebrew slaves should be set free, debtors forgiven and the land given a one-year sabbath of rest (Ex 21:2; Dt 15:1,2,12; Lv 25:2-4). For 490 years Israel had disobeyed this precept. As judgment, Jews became slaves of Babylon while their land rested the 70 years of sabbaths it had been denied.

While confessing this sin, pondering and praying, Daniel was given the revelation that another period of 490 years (70 weeks of years) lay ahead for his people and for Jerusalem (9:24). At the end of that time all of Israel’s sins would be purged, all prophecy fulfilled and ended, and the Messiah would be reigning on David’s throne in Jerusalem. These 70 weeks of years (490 years) were to be counted “from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem” (v 25). That crucial date is given to us in Scripture.

Nehemiah tells us that it was “in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king” (2:1) that he received the authorization to rebuild Jerusalem. When the day of the month was not given the first day was intended. There were several Artaxerxes, but only one, Longimanus, who ruled more than 20 years-from 465-425 B.C. Thus we have the key date from which this incredible prophecy was to be calculated: Nisan 1445 B.C.

At the end of 69 of these “weeks” (7x69 = 483 years) “Messiah the Prince” would be made known to Israel (Dn 9:25) and then “be cut off [slain], but not for himself” (v 26). Counting 483 years of 360 days each (the Hebrew and Babylonian calendar), a total of 173,880 days from Nisan 1445 B.C., brings us to Sunday, April 6, A.D. 32. On that very day, now celebrated as Palm Sunday, Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a young donkey and was hailed as Messiah the Prince! (Zechariah 9:9 was fulfilled at the same time.)

There is, however, an even deeper meaning to the phrase, “In the fulness of time....” April 6, A.D. 32 was, on the Hebrew calendar, tenth of Nisan. On that day the passover lamb was taken from the flock and placed under observation for four days to make certain that it was “without blemish.” During the same four days, Christ, whom John the Baptist had hailed as “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (Jn 1:29), was likewise on display before Israel. On the fourteenth of Nisan, “the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it [the passover lamb] in the evening [between 3:00 and 6:00 P.M.]” (Ex 12:6). It was during that precise time period that Jesus died on the cross!

It is fascinating to see how God uses man’s decrees and even man’s connivings against Him to fulfill His Word. The rabbis had determined not to arrest Jesus during passover, “lest there be an uproar of the people” (Mk 14:2). Yet that was when He had to die. Judas was not only Satan’s pawn, but God’s. Even the “thirty pieces of silver” he so shrewdly bargained for fulfilled prophecy (Zec 11:12-13). As Peter would declare in his Pentecost sermon, “Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain” (Acts 2:23). Paul wrote, “Christ our passover [lamb] is sacrificed for us” (1 Cor 5:7).

The fourteenth of Nisan began, as Jewish days did, at sunset Wednesday evening. That night Jesus and His disciples had the “last supper” in the upper room where they were preparing to eat the passover the following night. At this meal “before the feast of the passover” (Jn 13:21), Jesus told His disciples, “One of you shall betray me” (Jn 13:1). Earlier He said, significantly, “I tell you before...that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am he” (Jn 13:19). The word “he” is in italics and does not appear in the original. Jesus was declaring once again to His disciples that He was Yahweh, the I AM of Israel, who tells beforehand what will happen and makes certain that it comes to pass (Is 46:9-10).

Arrested by the Judas-led troop in the Garden later that night, Christ was taken secretly to the palace of Caiaphas, the high priest. A sham trial before the Sanhedrin, with hastily called false witnesses, convened sometime after midnight, condemned Christ to death as dawn broke. Shortly thereafter, Pilate, the Roman governor, was notified of the emergency. Hurriedly taken down side streets, the prisoner was received into the citadel at “the third hour” (Mk 15:25), about 9:00 A.M., Nisan 14. All over Israel preparations were underway to kill the passover lamb, which was to be eaten that night.

Jerusalem was crowded and in a state of great excitement. Valuing public relations, Pilate consulted his ever-volatile citizens and let them decide the prisoner’s fate. Incited by the rabbis, the bloodthirsty rabble suddenly turned against the One who had miraculously healed and fed so many of them. “Crucify him, crucify him” (Lk 23:21). “His blood be on us, and on our children” (Mt 27:25). The horrible chant echoed down Jerusalem’s narrow streets.

Shortly before noon the soldiers had finished their vicious, depraved sport. Jesus, scourged almost into unconsciousness and beaten about the face until he was nearly unrecognizable, was led through the frenzied, screaming mob out of the city to “the place of the skull.” By high noon, the One whom Jerusalem, in fulfillment of prophecy, had the previous Sunday hailed as its long-awaited Messiah, was hanging naked, in shame and agony, on the center cross between two thieves. Man had crucified his Creator! Angels recoiled in horror and the sun hid its face.

The next three hours of that Thursday afternoon the earth was darkened mysteriously(Mt 27:45) as God “laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Is 53:6). Thursday? Not “Good Friday”? Indeed not. Jesus himself had said, “For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth [i.e., in that part of Hades known as “Abraham’s bosom”]” (Mt 12:40; Lk 16:22). The gospel includes the declaration that Christ “rose again the third day” (1 Cor 15:4).

Obviously, had Christ been crucified on Friday, He couldn’t possibly have spent three days and three nights in the grave by Sunday morning. We are distinctly told that the angel rolled away the stone “as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week” (Mt 28:1). The tomb was already empty at that point, so Christ must have risen from the dead sometime prior to dawn.

Yet the myth of a “Good Friday” crucifixion persists, with much ritual and dogma built upon that obvious mistake. In this fact alone we have sufficient evidence of Rome’s manufacture and endorsement of untruth to cast doubt upon everything else it affirms with equal dogmatism. And what can be said for the Protestants who, by the millions, so willingly go along with this error?

Wednesday, Thursday, Friday-does it really matter? Yes! The day of our Lord’s crucifixion is of the utmost importance. If Christ was not three days and three nights in the grave, then He lied. Moreover, His death, to fulfill prophecy, had to occur at the very time the passover lambs were being slain throughout Israel. It is an astronomical fact that Nisan 14, A.D. 32, fell on Thursday.

“And it was the preparation of the passover....The Jews therefore...that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day...besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away” (Jn 19:14,31). Wait! Not a bone of the passover lamb (Ex 12:46) or of the Messiah (Ps 34:20) could be broken. Not knowing why he did it, “one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side” (Jn 19:34), fulfilling yet another scripture: “they shall look upon me whom they pierced” (Zec 12:10).

John explains that the “sabbath” which began at sunset the Thursday Christ was crucified “was an high day.” It was, in fact, the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, of which the first and last days were special sabbaths during which no work was to be done. That “high” sabbath ended Friday at sunset and was immediately followed by the weekly sabbath which ended at sunset on Saturday. Thus two sabbaths followed Christ’s death, preventing the women from coming to the grave until the third day, Sunday morning.

The rabbis thought that having Jesus crucified proved He was not the Messiah. In fact, it was one more proof that He was! In taking His clothes for a souvenir, in gambling for his robe and giving Him vinegar mixed with gall to drink, the soldiers unwittingly added to that proof the fulfillment of yet more prophecies (Ps 22:18; 69:21). The nails driven into hands and feet by Roman soldiers and the spear that pierced His side drew forth the blood of our redemption-all in fulfillment of prophecy!

It is impossible to remain an honest skeptic after comparing what the prophets said with the historical record of Jesus Christ, from the cradle to the Cross. Proof of the Resurrection, which we must leave for another time, is even more powerful! We have solid reason for our faith in Christ. Knowing the facts increases our joy and gives us courage to present the gospel with boldness and conviction.

The original article is located here.
http://www.thebereancall.org/node/5889

The Berean Call | PO Box 7019 | Bend | OR | 97702


And Easter is coming...

Best Regards,
Star Traveler


13 posted on 12/27/2007 4:33:19 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson