Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada accuses Iran of being weapons pipeline
Montreal Gazette and CanWest News Service via National Post ^ | 2007-12-26 | Allison Lampert

Posted on 12/26/2007 3:19:45 AM PST by Clive

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 12/26/2007 3:19:46 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


2 posted on 12/26/2007 3:20:34 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

yah...we’ll just file this under “NO SH-T..really??”

/sarcasm


3 posted on 12/26/2007 3:30:46 AM PST by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Don’t they do “National Intelligence Estimates” up there?

Heck, word came out on Christmas Eve that Iran was “helping” in Iraq.

This is the age of “containment” for Iran, of talking and getting along.

Just like we did while communism spread around the world in the 1950’s and 60’s.


4 posted on 12/26/2007 3:34:18 AM PST by Nextrush (NO WAY MCCAIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Just wait till Ron Paul becomes POTUS. He’ll recall our ambassador to Canada to punish them for accusing those poor innocent Iranians... /sarc
5 posted on 12/26/2007 3:59:26 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon

Yeah, it’s like, “Well, DUH, eh?” It’s aboot time some Canuck cluck awoke and spoke up.


6 posted on 12/26/2007 5:26:11 AM PST by flowerplough (Thompson should be the next president and Reagan should be the next face on Mt. Rushmore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
It’s aboot time some Canuck cluck awoke and spoke up.

Alright, but....cluck off.

7 posted on 12/26/2007 5:35:56 AM PST by period end of story (You need cooling, baby I'm not fooling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough; Casaubon
Here's a nickel , buy a clue.

We're on the same side, FRiends. Canada has had a CONSERVATIVE government for just over a year, and we've been kicking a** and taking names all over Ashcanistan since the games began.

Folks like you seem to enjoy complaining about how the USA has to do all this stuff alone, yet when your friend and neighbour is in the trenches with you eating the same dirt and killing the same sandmaggots, all you can do is denigrate and deride their contribution.

It's a small wonder why so few nations want to contribute when any effort to contribute to a common cause is belittled by the likes of you.

You should also know that there is a HUGE difference between knowing something is going on and lodging quiet diplomatic complaints and making a PUBLIC statement as Mr. MacKay did here. Often the backroom comment will get results, but this public comment is intended to provoke a reaction.

8 posted on 12/26/2007 6:21:45 AM PST by Don W ( Police were called to a day care where a three-year-old was resisting a rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clive; fanfan

Happy Boxing Day!


9 posted on 12/26/2007 9:29:16 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don W

lighten up frenchy

I wouldnt call cana-duhs gov. conservitive by any stretch.

Canada does pull its weight when it comes to the war on terror. (sorta)

I am glad they spoke up about iran...but saying iran runs weps is about on par with saying the sky is up.

Its amazing that we somehow pat the backs of politicians for stating the obvious and politically easy.


10 posted on 12/26/2007 9:09:06 PM PST by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; conniew; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; ...

11 posted on 12/27/2007 7:43:40 AM PST by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Don W

The New York Police Department, with approxilately 36,000 officers, measures up well ‘gainst Canada’s military. Canada has 62,000 military personnel including 9,500 sailors, 19,500 soldiers, 14,500 air force personnel and 20,000 administrative and support personnel, according to CBC news in July 2006.

Ain’t complainin’ ‘bout Canada’s own private slice of the war, yo, but I do contend that Canada and Europe have been cute little downy chicks hiding under Mother Hen America’s wings since the late 40’s.


12 posted on 12/27/2007 9:33:38 AM PST by flowerplough (Thompson should be the next president and Reagan should be the next face on Mt. Rushmore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fanfan; All

Some info and stats
http://www.sfu.ca/casr/ft-vehicle-casualties.htm

As of November 17, 2007, there have been 666 coalition deaths in Afghanistan as part of ongoing coalition operations (Operation Enduring Freedom and International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)): 398 American, 84 British, 73 Canadian, 28 German, 23 Spanish, 12 French, 12 Dutch, 11 Italian, 9 Danish, 5 Romanian, 4 Australian, 3 Norwegian, 2 Estonian, 2 Swedish, 1 Czech, 1 Finnish, 1
Polish, 1 Portuguese, 1 South Korean.


“Canada’s role in Afghanistan, consisting of operations against the Taliban and other insurgents in southern Afghanistan, has resulted in the largest number of fatal casualties for any single Canadian military mission since the Korean War. A reported total of 73 members of the Canadian Forces have died in Afghanistan between February 2002 and November 17, 2007. Of these, 65 were due to hostile circumstances, including 33 due to buried bombs[2], and eight were accidents or other non-hostile deaths.”

and from a 2006 article :

“Canadians are getting killed at a rate five times the average for NATO and U.S. forces in Afghanistan, where _ Canada’s soldiers have suffered more than one-quarter of the combat deaths in Afghanistan this year...”Germany, with a contingent 400 soldiers larger than the 2,300 Canadians, hasn’t been involved in any fighting and has suffered no combat casualties.”
http://techweb.rfa.org/pipermail/fbis/2006-November/131605.html——————————————————————————————————————————————————
*** it is not neccessarily the number of troops involved that counts...but the amount of sufferring—percentage of casualties according to the size of contingent—due to heavy fighting.


13 posted on 12/27/2007 10:21:04 AM PST by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

ping


14 posted on 12/27/2007 10:22:19 AM PST by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: exg

Thanks for that post, exg.


15 posted on 12/27/2007 10:41:28 AM PST by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough; All

301,139,947 , population of United States
32,777,300, population of Canada


21,000—number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan
2,500—number of Canadian troops in Afghanistan

.02%-percentage of U.S. casualties in Afghanistan in accordance with number of U.S. troops on the ground(398/21000)
.03%-percentage of Canadian casualties in Afghanistan in accordance with number of Canadian troops on the ground.
(73/2500)


16 posted on 12/27/2007 10:49:07 AM PST by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Hi fanfan!
You’re very welcome.
ping


17 posted on 12/27/2007 10:51:11 AM PST by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon

“Canada does pull its weight when it comes to the war on terror. (sorta)”


301,139,947 , population of United States
32,777,300, population of Canada


21,000—number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan
2,500—number of Canadian troops in Afghanistan


.02%-percentage of U.S. casualties in Afghanistan in accordance with number of U.S. troops on the ground(398/21000)
.03%-percentage of Canadian casualties in Afghanistan in accordance with number of Canadian troops on the ground.
(73/2500)


18 posted on 12/27/2007 11:11:32 AM PST by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clive
So declare war on Iran, Canada. Nobody is stopping you. But oh I forgot, you'd rather declare war on Mark Steyn.
19 posted on 12/27/2007 11:14:07 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon

Hey, at least Peter Mackay hasn’t said that Islam is a religion of peace in several months..... ;)


20 posted on 12/27/2007 1:00:07 PM PST by Catholic Canadian ( I love Stephen Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson