Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redrunner
"Did you know that in Nevada, a person who sexually assaults a dead body is guilty of a Class A felony and is required to register as a sex offender, but a person who commits a sex offense on a child, someone who abuses their position as a trusted authority figure to abuse a child, that person is not required to register? This is sick," Miller said.

Seems Ms. Miller is a bit of a a drama queen. First of all, a seventeen year old is not a child, as indicated by the fact that in this state the age of consent is sixteen. Second, why should an act that is otherwise perfectly legal suddenly become a serious felony simply due to where you work? If the age of consent is 16, sex with a 16, 17, or 18 year old studen should be grounds for firing, not grounds for prison. Third, is it really so shocking that the law considers somebody that enjoys sex with dead bodies a bit more sick and dangerous than somebody that enjoys sex with nubile seventeen year olds?

12 posted on 12/27/2007 8:52:39 PM PST by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Minn

Or you could change the age of consent, like Kentucky... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1944774/posts


13 posted on 12/27/2007 8:55:30 PM PST by redrunner (A liar will not be believed, even when he speaks the truth. -- Aesop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson