[Rick.Donaldson]

Interesting that you point out that your candidate “is as well qualified as Hunter having been a Senator longer” doesn’t make any sense, because Hunter isn’t a senator, so it shows you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Makes PERFECT SENSE. He was a CONGRESSMAN. And a Senator is obviously more qualified than a Congressman anytime. Ask Hillary :) (And I do know what I'm talking about, you just can't read and see the jokes. Sorry you're blind too.)

Just so you know, I'd be very happy with Hunter as President, IF he gets the nomination, but since he won't, I really think he is VERY HIGHLY qualified to be Thompson's Vice President. I've already put in a good word for him with Fred.

Go Fred.

[Kevmo]

“having been a Senator longer” presumes that one has been a senator. Your writing is piss poor. Then you do the standard Fred-supporter backpedal, claiming you were just joking. Take a writing class if you want to support your candidate better.

.

.

.

.

According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts

Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts

In this poll Hunter is up 3% and even with Paul and Thompson.
http://www.wxyz.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=3481ef60-8195-46a9-af04-b87b907bcfdd