BS.
To: Sub-Driver
Bush should have vetoed the omnibus appropriations bill instead.
2 posted on
12/28/2007 11:20:37 AM PST by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: Sub-Driver
Whiny Assed Liberals! OUT OF THE GENE POOL!
4 posted on
12/28/2007 11:22:29 AM PST by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
To: Sub-Driver
I love it when Harry’s eyes cross and spittle flies out of his mouth.
5 posted on
12/28/2007 11:30:35 AM PST by
DManA
To: Sub-Driver
Gee, maybe this means that all those useless DoD civilian employees will get furloughed after all.
6 posted on
12/28/2007 11:37:49 AM PST by
GreyFriar
( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
To: Sub-Driver
Subsequently, the government of Iraq raised objections to Section 1083, in which Congress strengthened the ability of victims of the brutality of Saddam Hussein to seek compensationWonder why this was inserted to begin with?
7 posted on
12/28/2007 11:38:12 AM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(No buy China!!)
To: Sub-Driver
Pelosi and Reid?? I’ve heard of them but have not seen them since the surge worked. Are they still around?
9 posted on
12/28/2007 11:46:27 AM PST by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: Sub-Driver
Would now be a good time for Bush to ask for the Line Item Veto Back?
12 posted on
12/28/2007 11:55:31 AM PST by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(To Err Is Human. To Arr is Pirate. To Urr is Liberal.)
To: Sub-Driver
It’s very simple, Pelousy - REMOVE the offending section and resubmit it. But of course, that would be counter-productive to your inserting it in the first place.
I always love this two-faced tap dance. Load a bill with unrelated pork, earmarks and provisions that the President has promised he will veto, then call the whaaaambulance when he does.
What does Defense Authorization have to do with civil lawsuits anyway, Pelousy?
13 posted on
12/28/2007 12:11:53 PM PST by
Right Cal Gal
(Remember Billy Dale!!!)
To: Sub-Driver
I thought Bela and Squint and all of the other congresscritters split DC and were on their Federal Hanaramakwansmas Break.
16 posted on
12/28/2007 12:21:47 PM PST by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: Sub-Driver
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid issued the following statement..."...it appears that President Bush plans to veto this legislation, which is crucial to our armed forces and their families."........"The American people will have every right to be disappointed if the President vetoes this legislation, needlessly delaying implementation of the troops' pay raise, the Wounded Warriors Act and other critical measures."I do not say this lightly. I hate these two faced lying people.
FMCDH(BITS)
20 posted on
12/28/2007 12:33:51 PM PST by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: Sub-Driver
This is the one time I will agree with Pelosi. This should have been brought up sooner.
This veto will screw up both military and DoD civilian pay, plus cause harm to the war effort. While it was being hammered out before Christmas, this issue should have been resolved. The dems were totally caving to the President anyway....why veto it now?
This is just poor planning on everyone’s part. Also, it makes us look stupid to have to cave to Iraqi demands. Seems to me we beat them. We should act like it.
21 posted on
12/28/2007 12:40:50 PM PST by
Sola Veritas
(Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
To: Sub-Driver
I asked this on another thread, is this bill separate from the defense budget and the war funds?
29 posted on
12/28/2007 1:36:24 PM PST by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: Sub-Driver
Dumb and Dumber at it again. :)
30 posted on
12/28/2007 1:42:20 PM PST by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever fully realize.)
To: Sub-Driver
OK, it does include everything, Defense budget and war funds. I just researched this subject.
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jN_Relk5QlI0AbzedY43Lm_KT6yw
The defence policy bill passed by veto-proof margins in the House and the Senate. Democratic aides said they have not ruled out any legislative options, including passing a technical correction or trying to override Bush's veto.
31 posted on
12/28/2007 1:54:34 PM PST by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: Sub-Driver
The Demonrats tried to throw in the bill a provision to feed their flesh eating lawyers - so they could "sue" Iraq for billions.
Incredible!
32 posted on
12/28/2007 1:59:59 PM PST by
SkyPilot
To: Sub-Driver
Harry and Nancy need to meet at a motel restuarant to discuss what they might need to do to improve their manhood.
What might follow could be ( if documented ) useful for modern day psychiatry.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson