Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D
Duncan Hunter is gaining momentum as more people realize he is the only Conservative left in the race. THere is no other option.

In a country where John Francois Kerry and a slip-and-fall shyster won 253 electoral votes, what possible reason do you have for believing that Duncan Hunter could be elected President?

Do you care who wins in November, or only who wins the nomination?

15 posted on 12/29/2007 8:38:55 AM PST by Jim Noble (Trails of trouble, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
In a country where John Francois Kerry and a slip-and-fall shyster won 253 electoral votes, what possible reason do you have for believing that Duncan Hunter could be elected President?

You answered your own question. I'm voting for Hunter even if I have to write his name in.

21 posted on 12/29/2007 8:48:59 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
In a country where John Francois Kerry and a slip-and-fall shyster won 253 electoral votes, what possible reason do you have for believing that Duncan Hunter could be elected President?


What do you base you assumption on? The socialist media? The polls? The so called political experts thought Thomas Dewey had defeated Harry Truman in 1948 to the point of publishing it in the newspaper. These experts also were convinced Al Gore had beaten Bush in 2000 based on the always reliable exit polls. William Seward was the odds on favorite to become the nominee in the 1860 GOP convention but somehow Abraham Lincoln won the nomination and he hadn't held office for 11 years! How you can make such an assumption before one vote being cast defies logic.

Do you care who wins in November, or only who wins the nomination?

I care about a president who does not show a history of flip flopping on the issues simply to do what is politically expedient. Hunter is the only candidate who has been consistently Conservative through out his career. The other candidates have changed their positions on one or more issues to a Conservative point of view at some point in their careers. Either they are indecisive or disingenuous.
22 posted on 12/29/2007 8:50:30 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

I beieve it’s very obvious that he cares who wins the Presidency.


64 posted on 12/29/2007 10:26:28 AM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

What a typical statement. You come up with personal failings of Hunter’s record or his ability in interviews, debates, speeches, SOME ACTUAL FAULT OF THE CANDIDATE OTHER THAN THE STUPID NAME RECOGNITION. It’s the same old, same old. Hunter is the strongest possible candidate with his personal and political traits. Enough said.


93 posted on 12/30/2007 5:05:15 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER '08: the only candidate whose record matches his talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson