Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tantiboh

It’s all in his record. Look it up.

And it’s not Huckabee. Conservatives are supporting Thompson and Hunter, the only conservatives in the race. Every poll we’ve run on FR shows FReepers supporting Thompson/Hunter by huge majorities. Thompson/Hunter are currently supported by 80% of all FReepers responding to our poll:

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=207

Free Republic is a conservative forum. We advocate for conservatism and for conservative candidates. Liberals, RINOs, nanny staters and liars need not apply.


256 posted on 12/29/2007 3:08:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

Jim,

“Liberals, RINOs, nanny staters and liars”

Direct hit on Romney on all four.

You sunk his battleship!


257 posted on 12/29/2007 3:13:00 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

~”It’s all in his record. Look it up.”~

I’ve seen the record, I’ve studied it here for months. There’s plenty of grounds on which to criticize Romney. He is not my first pick. But, frankly, to paint him in the harsh way that FR has painted him is histrionics - and most of it was generated in an effort to advance Thompson. Well, it didn’t work. Now what?

~”Every poll we’ve run on FR shows FReepers supporting Thompson/Hunter by huge majorities.”~

That’s true, but FR draws a particular kind of conservative - perhaps even the best ones. But to extrapolate that to the Republican base as a whole is a mistake - FR participants are not a representative sample. It’s cold reality, and it means that we will not be nominating a perfect conservative. The time for advocating Hunter, Thompson, etc. has passed. At this time, I’m advocating that we take what we can get when we can get it. That means compromising our choice. Not our principles - we can fight for the rest of them another day. But we’ll have a whole lot less heartburn over our principles with Romney than we will with Giuliani, McCain, Huckabee, or a Democrat.

~”We advocate for conservatism and for conservative candidates.”~

Well and good. But how effective is that advocacy if you don’t win?


259 posted on 12/29/2007 3:21:42 PM PST by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; All

I have noting for awhile that there appears to be a organized effort to convince Freepers that Romney is a conservative. I say this because too many posts use the same verbage. Whether is an attack on Fred (too old, lacks energy etc.) or other candidates or support for Mitt they parrot each other and they absolutely lie about Romney’s very well documented record. It follows the same pattern that you see in the MSM when an organized attack on the President occurs...they all say the same thing at the very same time. Just my two cents for what its worth.


261 posted on 12/29/2007 3:27:42 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Mitt to supporters: "DON'T TRY TO DEFEND MY LIBERAL RECORD. BELITTLE THEM WITH PERSONAL ATTACKS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson