Uh, this is Free Republic. We advocate for conservatives/conservatism not RINOS/liberalism. We will continue to advocate for life, family, liberty, national security, individual freedom, limited government, low taxes, originalist judges and the constitution, etc, regardless of who wins the current election. You can shove your dose of RINO reality where the sun don’t shine. I’m sure it’ll do wonders for you.
Let’s see how Mitt fares...
life - who knows what he really is committed to??
family - seems to be pro-family, if we judge by pictures (he did name his son “Tagg” - What’s that about??
liberty - forcing people to buy insurance or face penalties isn’t freedom. It is totalitarianism.
national security - no experience, who knows??
individual freedom - at least he if for free markets
limited government - maybe
low taxes - no. He is for high fees, judging by his budgets
originalist judges - no. he is for “diverse judges”, based on his own policy as demonstrated in MA
constitution - I’d give him a low grade here, based on his view of the Second Amendment and his abortion history.
I don’t think Willard Mitt Romney passes the smell test here.
~”We will continue to advocate for life, family, liberty, national security, individual freedom, limited government, low taxes, originalist judges and the constitution, etc, regardless of who wins the current election.”~
Couldn’t agree more. I do believe this is a disagreement of methodology, not ideology. It’s tougher to implement what you advocate when you’re out of power.
~”You can shove your dose of RINO reality where the sun don’t shine.”~
Fair enough. I’ll keep you posted how it goes in the real world!
Thanks for the discussion.