The facts are two years old.
The misrepresentation of the facts was done by the person who posted the article, where he wrote “More proof of Romney support for the Culture of Death.”
Romney does not support the culture of death, and that claim misrepresents the facts that are found in the article, which clearly states that Romney vetoed the legislation, and then tried to protect the hospitals after the legislation was passed.
he only switched because his legal counsel told him he’d lose the case because the law required the hospitals to dispense the medication — NOT because he supported the “culture of death”.
So my statement was exactly accurate — a 2-year-old story was posted so the poster could misrepresent the facts.
I don’t know why he couldn’t just find a more recent story that he could misrepresent. :-)
Would it be more accurate then to say that Romney doesn’t take a stand against the Culture of Death... that he surrenders... he allows it to happen?
Like Pontius Pilate...