Replies

If it was one or two people, you might easily dismiss them.

I like to make up my own mind. However, in a lot of these cases, the endorsees get a chance to actually meet the candidate, or their campaign staff, and really ask questions and evaluate.

If I could interview each candidate for a half hour, I’d trust my own judgment more than anybody else’s judgment.

But since I don’t get to do that, I find it useful when people I trust DO get to sit down with the candidates, and then tell me they trust them. It’s not as good as doing it myself, but it’s better then not having the input.

In this case though, this was more important to me because the author is a respected conservative evangelical Christian writer, the kind that might be expected to go to Huckabee, or to have concerns about Romney, so I’m always happy when someone like this endorses my candidate.

I can respect that you are supporting Romney, unlike most folks I won’t attempt to demonize you for following a candidate. I believe that any of the Republican candidates running would be far better than any of the RATS running.

That being said, I do doubt Romney’s new found positions. He has not done a good enough job, in my humble opinion, of explaining why he thought the murder of the unborn was OK, and why he now thinks it is wrong. I also think he has not explained why he was so against the Reagan-Bush years and now wants to wrap himself in the Reagan flag. Also, when I heard his attempt to explain what the meaning of the word “saw” is, I had to cringe.

Again, I guess I am just missing it.