Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christopher Hitchens on Benazir Bhutto's death
London Telegraph ^ | 29/12/2007 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 12/29/2007 5:37:27 PM PST by Aristotelian

The sternest critic of Benazir Bhutto would not have been able to deny that she possessed an extraordinary degree of physical courage.

(snip)

The likeliest culprit is the al-Qa'eda/Taliban axis, perhaps with some assistance from its many covert and not-so-covert sympathisers in the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence. These were the people at whom she had been pointing the finger since the huge bomb that devastated her welcome-home motorcade on October 18.

She would have been in a good position to know about this connection, because when she was prime minister, she pursued a very active pro-Taliban policy, designed to extend and entrench Pakistani control over Afghanistan and to give Pakistan strategic depth in its long confrontation with India over Kashmir.

The fact of the matter is that Miss Bhutto's undoubted courage had a certain fanaticism to it.

(snip)

A nominal socialist, Zulfiqar Bhutto was an autocratic opportunist, and this family tradition was carried on by the PPP, a supposedly populist party that never had a genuine internal election and was in fact - like quite a lot else in Pakistan - Bhutto family property.

Daughter of Destiny is the title she gave to her autobiography. She always displayed the same un-ironic lack of embarrassment. How prettily she lied to me, I remember, and with such a level gaze from those topaz eyes, about how exclusively peaceful and civilian Pakistan's nuclear program was.

How righteously indignant she always sounded when asked unwelcome questions about the vast corruption alleged against her and her husband, Asif Ali Zardari.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bhutto; hitchens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
When Hitchens is good, he's very good.
1 posted on 12/29/2007 5:37:29 PM PST by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

He gets the WoT, too bad he misses the mark on other issues.


2 posted on 12/29/2007 5:45:19 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

BumP..

It’s rough being a populist these days.


3 posted on 12/29/2007 5:48:26 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kalee
Forgive me, but I don’t know the meaning of WoT. I tried looking the acronym up, but nothing made sense. Please, clue me in.
4 posted on 12/29/2007 6:01:24 PM PST by Aristotelian ("Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kalee
He gets the WoT, too bad he misses the mark on other issues .

Are you referring, for example, to his view on Henry Kissinger as a war criminal?

5 posted on 12/29/2007 6:02:54 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Wheel of Time,or something like it!


6 posted on 12/29/2007 6:03:10 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

War on terrorism ?


7 posted on 12/29/2007 6:04:12 PM PST by The Mayor ( A man's heart plans his way, but the Lord directs his steps.—Proverbs 16:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

8 posted on 12/29/2007 6:05:17 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

War on Terror.


9 posted on 12/29/2007 6:06:05 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

It’spainfulto read these atheist idiots, and I don’t. I mean, what’s the foundation of their morality, Karl Marx, or Lenin? We don’t share a common denominator with them. Why be upset about this event, if you’re an atheist in a godless universe?!


10 posted on 12/29/2007 6:08:53 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian; M. Espinola
From the article itself:

This is what makes her murder such a disaster. There is at least some reason to think that she had truly changed her mind, at least on the Taliban and al-Qa'eda, and was willing to help lead a battle against them.

She had, according to some reports, severed the connection with her rather questionable husband. She was attempting to make the connection between lack of democracy in Pakistan and the rise of mullah-manipulated fanaticism.

Of those preparing to contest the highly dubious upcoming elections, she was the only candidate with anything approaching a mass appeal to set against the siren calls of the fundamentalists. And, right to the end, she carried on without the fetish of "security" and with lofty disregard for her own safety.

Bhutto may have been the last chance for Pakistani democracy. You are correct about Hitchens -- he is spot on here.

11 posted on 12/29/2007 6:23:30 PM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
but I don’t know the meaning of WoT

In Hitchen's case, wacky old turd

12 posted on 12/29/2007 6:46:06 PM PST by llevrok ( "In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom. In water, there is bacteria." - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Spoken like a well indoctrinated defeatist Eurocrat. He portrays her life as a tainted pearl thrown to swine.

How smug.

13 posted on 12/29/2007 6:48:33 PM PST by Earthdweller (The liberal MSM...Buddies of Romney F Kerry and the socialist march to China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
When Hitchens is good, he's very good.

Yes. Thanks.

14 posted on 12/29/2007 7:17:48 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

What I find odd about this is she provided a pattern that could be exploited to kill. It was almost like a death wish. She knew that she was on the top of a hit list and that they had the ability to send 100’s of murders at once against her.


15 posted on 12/29/2007 7:37:23 PM PST by Domangart (editor and publisher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

WoT = Wheel of Terror, a popular TV show in Muslim nations where the contestants guess the number of letters in various bomb designs, explosives, equations for detonators, etc., hosted by al-Sajak and a masked woman built suspiciously like Helen Thomas.

SCARY TV show.


16 posted on 12/29/2007 7:43:38 PM PST by mkjessup (Hunter-Bolton '08 !! Patriots who will settle for nothing less than *Victory* in the War on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; Aristotelian

Well stated. Now the problem is preventing the Al-Qaida/Taliban axis, bankrolled in part by the Saudis, from gaining control of Pakistan nuclear weapons arsenal.


17 posted on 12/29/2007 9:45:23 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never 'free')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

Re Saudi Arabia, General David Petraeus in an end-of-year briefing for journalists in Baghdad Saturday described progress by Iraq’s neighbors, saying attacks using Iranian weapons had declined and praising Syria and Saudi Arabia for curbing the flow of foreign fighters.


18 posted on 12/29/2007 9:57:33 PM PST by Aristotelian ("Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

And with this piece he is very good.


19 posted on 12/29/2007 10:08:00 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bfl


20 posted on 12/29/2007 10:12:10 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson