[ClearCase_guy]

This could turn into a JFK type thing. The leader is dead, but how? Folks say it was a bullet. The government says it wasn’t. And people start thinking the government is covering something up. Why would the government deny the bullet wound, then witnesses say they saw the bullet wound?? Maybe people will start thinking the government was behind the assassination. Could get real interesting.

[skimask]

The DUmmies are already up to their ears in conspiracy theories about this. All of the theories have Bush or Rove implicated.

[cricket]

The difference here of course, it what happened here afterwards versus the turmoil and world threat it poses; that is occurring in Pakistan. Our conspiracy theories almost a luxury of thoughtful considerations; or hasty opining. Books written. . .theories abound.

Pakistan, offers no luxuries here; not in real time or imaginary. . .

[Star Traveler]

You said — “Why would the government deny the bullet wound, then witnesses say they saw the bullet wound??”

Did the government deny the existence of the bullet wound, or rather, did they say that something else was what killed her — namely the extreme hit and crushing of the skull from the bomb blast?

I didn’t understand the situation that the government was denying the existence of a bullet wound. Perhaps there was no bullet wound (I have seen one other report to that effect, actually). But, either way (whether there was a bullet wound or not), it appears that a bullet is not the cause of death.

Regards,
Star Traveler