Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia
>>>>>>”If you are stopped by a Fort Worth police officer and you are arrested for DWI, we are going to get a sample,”

This is only if you are arrested for it though, right? Is this really a bad thing?<<


Well, normally you are not required to give evidence against your self - right against self incrimination and all that.
104 posted on 12/29/2007 8:39:16 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

You posted: Well, normally you are not required to give evidence against your self - right against self incrimination and all that.
***

I am pretty sure the Supreme Court has interpreted the constitution on this and related issues (writing samples, hair samples, voice “prints” etc.) and has determined that the taking of them doesn’t violate the 5th amendment. If we considered this in the context of other crimes such as murder or molestation of a child, there would be a lot less argument about taking blood, or even semen samples. Once you are arrested the state is entitled to its evidence. I disagree with those who have posted to the contrary here.


206 posted on 12/30/2007 1:22:29 PM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson