Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gridlock

You’re right, it is old hat, but that doesn’t make it any less offensive. I don’t smoke and never have, and I love walking into a restaurant or bar with no smoke, but if patrons can choose whether or not to go in and spend their money, then the government has no business regulating. Even more offensive is the fabricated “justification” that the reason for the ban is to protect the other employees. How disingenious can you get?


19 posted on 12/30/2007 5:54:48 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: dinoparty

Leaving aside the rights argument for a moment, surely you can acknowledge that the predicted downturn in business for restaurants and bars has failed to materialize in states that have enacted similar bans in the past.


29 posted on 12/30/2007 6:04:32 AM PST by gridlock (There are 49 other states in the Union. We don't need another President from Arkansas just yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson