To: Zuben Elgenubi
How did you read the article and respond in less than 2.5 minutes?
Why should he read it when he already knows that he already knows the truth: if the article agrees with him, it's true and reading it was a waste of time; if it disagrees with him, it's not true and reading it would be a waste of time.
5 posted on
12/30/2007 12:02:07 PM PST by
aruanan
To: aruanan
China's political stability may be more fragile than thought. The country faces huge domestic challenges -- an aging population lacking any form of social security, wholesale problems in the financial system that dwarf those revealed in the U.S. sub-prime loan mess and the breakdown of its health system. These problems are as big as ever, but China has fewer resources to meet them than we thought.Did not know this.
To: aruanan; Zuben Elgenubi; Parmenio
Hey if you guys want to be logical...
Maybe he read the paper version or the on-line version before it was posted here.
I do think that it would take a lot of expertise to be able to contradict the opinion piece and I would like to know how he arrived at his view.
49 posted on
12/30/2007 1:27:38 PM PST by
Positive
(Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson