Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign
Any direct quote that proves your point is fine. The floor is yours.

Don't worry, I will find it for you. It should be obvious, however, that they didn't perform an autopsy on her as required by law. That, by itself, means it was not necessary according to the government. Of course, you could show me the law that Pakistan does not require an autopsy in a suspicious death in the meantime? That way we both get to work : )

15 posted on 12/30/2007 4:42:02 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: bjs1779
The Times of India does not report anything that is not already reported in the Pakistani media. The source of this report is this - from the Pakistani paper - "The Nation"
17 posted on 12/30/2007 4:49:50 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: bjs1779
It should be obvious, however, that they didn't perform an autopsy on her as required by law.

It's obvious that they didn't perform an autopsy??

You do realize that many autopsies involve only "external post-mortem", right?

All of which makes the following Times of India line from the article, double-talk.


18 posted on 12/30/2007 4:53:46 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson