What is it that you are trying to say, please?
That in post 34 you were trying to lecture me, and that by post 41 you were saying this “What I mean to say is that I’m not sure he can be trusted — I don’t know what to believe any more because of what he has done in the past. It’s to the point where you need proof that matches the words.
I think that you were trying to lay a cloud down initially, with a subtle insult and using a candidate that you probably dislike more than me to make a vague negative statement (about me)that you did not just want to throw out there. I think that you were even playing to the crowd a little in post 34.
When you portray yourself as a strong Catholic accepting Mormonism as Christian, and then I ask you the Catholic position on Mormonism, you have never responded, yet for this we have a long conversation.