Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norman Bates
At a time when some candidates present themselves to voters as something they haven't always been, we find the Arizona senator to be the genuine article.

Oh really...?

SEN. MCCAIN "NEVER SUPPORTED AMNESTY"? (McCain's Claim from Sunday)

It depends on the meaning of “never” (McCain's Convenient Memory)

6 posted on 01/01/2008 2:10:46 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Don’t forget he flip-flopped on which Protestant group he belonged to. In South Carolina, he’s Baptist. In DC, he’s Episcopalian.


9 posted on 01/01/2008 2:44:51 AM PST by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

McCain’s definition of what “never” is is the same as the majority of our politicians. It is the definition of “amnesty” that they get confused. So, McCain can say he was “never” in favor of amnesty because he defines what “amnesty” is just like Jorge Bush, Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, etc! If an illegal “earns” their way to legal by paying a fine and being good, that is NOT amnesty.


16 posted on 01/01/2008 5:51:13 AM PST by TexasRedeye (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson