Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There's a picture at the source.
1 posted on 01/01/2008 9:18:55 AM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bahblahbah

I think the back view is what go them in trouble. The front view is a fine testament to feminine beauty.


2 posted on 01/01/2008 9:22:53 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bahblahbah

Gee, wonder how many shares of Google the ChiCom own?

They yell jump, Google says, “How Far?”


3 posted on 01/01/2008 9:23:40 AM PST by wolfcreek (The Status Quo Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bahblahbah
"OKAY! How many of you immediately typed 'www.pamperedpassions.com' into your web browser? Eh?"

http://www.pamperedpassions.com/

Busted!

4 posted on 01/01/2008 9:23:40 AM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bahblahbah
Here's the picture:

Uh, you can see a lot more flesh on most daily European newspapers. This makes no sense. Plus it's hardly provacative.

5 posted on 01/01/2008 9:25:41 AM PST by tlj18 (Mike Huckabee is nonsense on stilts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bahblahbah

Folks, Goggle is a private business. They are in the business of selling merchandise. No government entity told them to pull this, they did on their own.

I don’t see what the gripe is here. A private business caters to its customers. That is the nature of free enterprize.


13 posted on 01/01/2008 9:37:52 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bahblahbah

I don’t see why google, a private outfit, doesn’t have a right to guard their image, whatever they decide it should be.

Google is family-oriented. The last thing they need is to have parents start thinking of them as a risk to their kids. I think they are entirely right on this one. Michael Eisner virtually destroyed Disney by crossing lines and wrecking their suitable-for-family image.

These images may be fine for strong-minded freepers, but no doubt there are parents out there who might not want their kids to see these pictures.


19 posted on 01/01/2008 9:55:15 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Squantos; Travis McGee; Dog Gone

Eurotrash offended by nudity, get out of here.


21 posted on 01/01/2008 10:01:40 AM PST by razorback-bert (Remember that amateurs built the Ark while professionals built the Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bahblahbah

...they’re just “taking everything” to the ‘lowest common denominator’, to avoid offending Islamofacists in the EU.


24 posted on 01/01/2008 10:08:20 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, FRed, Run. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson