[CHICAGOFARMER]

POSTING ALERT TROLL

Who is MrArbitrage123

Are you hiding your ABOUT PAGE?

I reviewed your posts and you are a FOX and Republican hater.

With your joining the FR in May 2007, suspect you are a democratic seminar poster.

Prove us wrong.

[GOP_Lady]

I, for one, very much appreciate Fox News. We are fortunate to have them. They are fair and balanced in my eyes.

[capt. norm]

I am so turned off by the actions of these people that I feel the damage to my perception of them is irreparable.

I agree about the damaged part. It shows in your post. I read it and said "Now that is one damaged individual".

You sure are easy to damage....just like a liberal.

You have now become a victim, every liberal's dream. Enjoy!

[Antoninus]

As long as Huck defeats Flip Romney in Iowa, it'll all be worth it. Flip is a GOP disaster waiting to happen. Nothing would please me more than to see him tank in Iowa after spending a king's ransom to buy victory.

If Flip and Rudy both lose in NH and IA, it will blow their plans to heck. I don't like Huck and wouldn't vote for him in the primary, but I consider him superior to either of these charlatans.

[Columbine]

It wouldn't be so bad if this underhanded network at least required their regulars to DISCLOSE their ties and endorsements of specific candidates but NO, they deceive their viwers by passing ofgf their "round tables" as objective experts.

What the heck are you talking about?

Fox presents both sides. That doesn't mean objective experts, it means one person from each side.

I agree that your perception is damaged beyond repair but I don't think that's the fault of Fox News.

[Admin Moderator]

Quit placing youtube content in the Editorial sidebar.

Thanks,

[ElPatriota]

Call me nuts, but I am beginning to notice a pattern in many of the posts here in FR to seem to be designed to cause disharmony and resentment between Social-Conservatives (Religious and non-religious) and the 'regular or true’ conservatives' (economics, guns, taxes, state rights, small government, etc)

I have this uneasy feeling that a bunch out there of Republican enemies, it could be a bunch a fags for all I know - are passing themselves for "Economic, personal liberty" conservatives...

You have to agree that these themes would come very handy to the left who would hammer on those themes in order to fight off the Christian/Social conservatives.

I find it very interesting that this 'hard core economic, personal liberties' bunch NEVER MENTION anything on social values. Conveniently?... Rarely anything against the FAGS – Even though we know the danger they represent to our ‘beloved' MILITARY that all groups in FR seem to profess? And this was true, why is it they never voice this concern knowing full well they can't wati to invade the MILITARY so they can it for social engineering? you do know, this will happen if we don't protect them, right?.... BUT DO THEY EVER express this concern anywhere?.... If they do I have never seen it. Same thing with abortion.... it's almost like they do it on purpose in order to exacerbate the division between the groups.

And you could not see this ‘tone’ ore 'mode' of attacks, more pronounced that with Hukabee’s posts. I noticed that this bunch is plainly insulting Christian values, the Bible, and doing it with such hate and venom; I have to wonder if they are doing this on purpose. The more they piss off the Social-conservatives, religious and non-religious, the more likely they will push them toward Huck, This means Fred is done... and yes, I agree, that two things could happen: (a) The Dems could defeat the Reps (I believe this will happen). OR, Hucks’ candidacy will snowball attracting most of social-conservatives and many the 'good' Democrats and Independents, enough to win the election. Now this could very good or very bad if he turns out to be another Carter.

But again my point is, would intelligent, thoughtful, educated, 'true' conservatives would be saying what they are saying about Huck, not knowing that they might be helping out to deepen the division between the two groups? IOW, could they really be that stupid?... Do you know what I mean?

[SubMareener]

If Mike had not shown the attack ad to the press, then this would not look like “cheap lawyer trick # 1”. However, I think the FreeRepublic.com should still invite the Capital Offense to play at an Inaugural Ball for President Fred D. Thompson!

[vox humana]

This is the part of the press conference that has about a snowball's chance in hell of being aired on Fox News.

There is a good reason for not airing the Huckster on Fox News.

Fox News is a news channel, not a comedy channel.

[bigjoesaddle]

THanks for the clip. He is taking the high road because he would gain NOTHING going negative. Smart politics. He reminds me more and more of the Clintons every day.

[Paraclete]

I’m from Iowa and I’m with you. I just decided for the “Huckster” and I’m taking several more undecided’s with with me. I’ve had it with the orchestrated effort to discredit Huckabee from the so-called GOP elite. I chaired my congressional district for Reagan in ‘80 and know oppositional crap when I see it.

P.S. I agree with you about FOX. But I’m just as disgusted with all the O.J./Anna Nicole/Stacy/Britney/Paris baloney.

[RDTF]

There was no high road taken here by not showing an ad that he paid to have made. It’s more likely a brilliant move for a cash stretched candidate. Baiting the press and it worked beautifully. Say you have a negative ad, then say you have decided against airing it, but then you give it to the press... Everyone is talking about it today. They are now showing the ad on Fox. For Free.

[ozzymandus]

Fine, watch CNN. Or maybe you’re an olberboy fan.