[Man50D]

No, and if you’d bothered to actually read what I said you wouldn’t even have asked that stupid question as the quote already gave the answer.

I read every word of your post and it only shows you regard polls as an exact science. They don't come close to being reliable enough to consider them accurate.

Unfortunately too many people approach their candidates like they do a sports team and think lying to themselves is a show of loyalty.

Unfortunately too many people use the same approach and irrationality with polls.

[discostu]

Sorry but you obviously did not read what I wrote, you obviously read two words decided the rest and made a patently foolish counter argument. And you continue to do so. I never said, never even intimated, that polls are an exact science. In fact I said, in the part you quoted, that they can be wrong. So why don’t you stop writing and actually READ and UNDERSTAND, because every time you write you demonstrate how little you do of the far more important two.