To: discostu
Sorry but you obviously did not read what I wrote, you obviously read two words decided the rest and made a patently foolish counter argument. In fact I said, in the part you quoted, that they can be wrong.
Thank you for confirming my point! Polls can be wrong and by association are therefore unreliable!
So why dont you stop writing and actually READ and UNDERSTAND, because every time you write you demonstrate how little you do of the far more important two.
Ah yes, absent of any facts the last resort is to use insults. Very clever strategy.
74 posted on
01/01/2008 8:53:53 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
To: Man50D
Individual polls can be wrong, but hundreds of polls over the course of 13 months draw a clear and obvious picture. There’s a handful of candidates that are just plain doomed.
It’s not my fault you obviously didn’t bother to read what I wrote, and if pointing out the truth insults you that’s up to you to change the truth.
101 posted on
01/02/2008 7:02:50 AM PST by
discostu
(a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson