Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$100 Oil and the 'S' Word(Speculators)
cnnmoney.com ^ | January 2 2008: 12:51 PM EST | Steve Hargreaves

Posted on 01/02/2008 10:53:22 AM PST by kellynla

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Greed is driving oil prices to $100 a barrel.

That's a common feeling among the general public, which sees record profits for investment banks that bet on oil prices - making wealthy oil companies even wealthier - while drivers shell out $3 and more for a gallon of gas.

It's also a common refrain from OPEC states. Having to defend themselves against charges their production quotas are responsible for the high prices, they point to near-average crude oil supplies and say speculation is what's behind the frenzy.

But industry experts offer mixed opinions on speculative investment's impact on oil prices. Some say it's marginal, that strong demand and limited supply are the real reasons oil prices have risen five-fold since 2002, and say additional investors actually benefit the market by adding more liquidity.

Others say the tight supply and demand situation has been known for a while, and nothing but speculation is behind the doubling of oil prices over the last year. They say there is a cost to the sheer number of oil contracts now traded on the oil exchanges, and this trading has just enriched Wall Streeters at the expense of average Americans.

The Energy Information Administration, the Energy Department's independent statistical and analysis arm, thinks strong demand and limited supply - otherwise knows as "the fundamentals" - is why oil is so pricey.

"Our view is that the market is tighter [than last year]," said Doug MacIntyre, senior oil market analyst at EIA. "We don't have the inventories now."

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: crude; energy; oil; speculators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 01/02/2008 10:53:23 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla
the 'S' Word (Speculators)

Oh...I would've guess Saudis
2 posted on 01/02/2008 10:55:26 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (Creatures are divided into 6 kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Monera, Protista, & Saudi Arabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

My guess is $hit.


3 posted on 01/02/2008 11:00:16 AM PST by b4its2late (GITMO is way too nice of a place to house low life terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The only speculation is that most will have little problem buying gas made from $100.00 oil.


4 posted on 01/02/2008 11:00:51 AM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

email Congress for a full court press to uncap the thousands of domestic oil wells and start drilling new ones on and offshore - pronto!!!

the mere thought of the US getting serious will have positive results.


5 posted on 01/02/2008 11:10:41 AM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Bubble Oil?


6 posted on 01/02/2008 11:16:41 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Do you agree with the article?


7 posted on 01/02/2008 11:17:38 AM PST by Son House (Lower Tax Rates for MORE Income Opportunities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
What power does Congress have to uncap thousands of domestic wells?

Better yet, what potentially productive wells can be uncapped?

8 posted on 01/02/2008 11:21:28 AM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
I believe so. If the economy here is slowing as the latest economic reports suggest and likewise in Europe(Britain) then it follows demand will slacken. But the traders seem not to care about this and simply keep finding more (suckers)to buy the contracts at ever higher prices.

A always as the new blood floods into the trading of this commodity in the hopes of a sure killing, the old pros will back out, selling their contracts which have already been run up by the newbies. Like any Ponzi scheme, when the traders left realize they have no one willing to buy at a higher price, as the realization of a slowing world economy sets in, the blood will run as traders dump, for whatever they can get, their rapidly becoming worthless futures
contracts.

I make no predictions as to when but only that it will happen. Oil will again be below $40.00bbl when the dust settles.

9 posted on 01/02/2008 11:29:10 AM PST by aroundabout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
The market determines the probability of the wells being reopened. The higher the price the more likely more oil will be pumped from existing wells to fuel the demand.

We are also far past the price at which shale oil deposits are developed cost effectively.I believe that price is $65 bbl.

10 posted on 01/02/2008 11:32:26 AM PST by aroundabout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Most have the potential. Many may be minimal producers, but the aggregate may be well worth it. Some in Western KY have been capped for years and sit amongst the tobacco and marijuana fields.

The point is for the US to get out there and shake the bushes. Don’t sit around waiting for OPEC to show favor and reduce a obscenely high priced product dearly needed by the west - you know how they love us so much!

11 posted on 01/02/2008 11:34:27 AM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

You are right in that most oil is not extracted from a well head and is capped when the production rate depletes. However, Congress is not stopping these wells from being reworked.


12 posted on 01/02/2008 11:47:24 AM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I guess someone will be having a prosperious New Year. The little people will have to work harder...haha.


13 posted on 01/02/2008 12:03:05 PM PST by fanboy88 (SSDD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

(Better yet, what potentially productive wells can be uncapped?)

These wells were all shut down over the last 25
years because they were not making enough money.
Now Denbury is building a CO2 plant and plans to
inject the CO2 into the wells and force the oil
to the surface. At $20\bbl this wasn’t feaseable
at $100\bbl they are going back to these capped wells.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_Nov_22/ai_n15865344

Denbury Resources Agrees to Acquire $250 Million of Additional Producing and Tertiary Oil Properties
Business Wire, Nov 22, 2005

DALLAS — Denbury Resources Inc. (NYSE:DNR) (”Denbury” or the “Company”) today announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire oil properties located in Mississippi and Alabama for $250 million. The acquisition is expected to close in late January 2006 and is subject to satisfactory completion of the Company’s examination of the environmental condition of the properties and its title examination.

—The acquisition includes purchase of controlling interests in three fields: Tinsley Field approximately 40 miles northwest of Jackson, Mississippi; Citronelle Field in Southwest Alabama; and the smaller South Cypress Creek Field near the Company’s Eucutta Field in Eastern Mississippi.
Most Popular Articles
in Business

—All three fields are potential carbon dioxide (”CO2”) tertiary flood candidates. The Company initially has estimated that these fields have aggregate reserve potential from CO2 tertiary floods of approximately 60 to 75 million barrels of oil equivalent (”MMBOE”) net to the interest to be acquired. This reserve potential increases to approximately 70 to 85 MMBOE by including the Company’s existing interest in Tinsley Field.

—The Company has recently acquired interests at Tinsley Field from other third parties and is continuing to seek additional interests in this field. The Company has initially estimated that this field has aggregate reserve potential from CO2 tertiary floods of approximately 30 to 40 MMBOE net to the interest to be acquired. This reserve potential increases to approximately 40 to 50 MMBOE by including the Company’s existing interest in the field.


14 posted on 01/02/2008 12:14:24 PM PST by WKB (FDT= Alabama's song from1982 He's "Close Enough To Perfect For Me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: G8 Diplomat
Didn’t Nancy Pelosi say that under HER watch this would never happen? /s
15 posted on 01/02/2008 12:24:30 PM PST by oiler (Reagan Republicans Unite!!!!! Draft Fred Thompson in 08')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

It is not greed, it is demand.


16 posted on 01/02/2008 12:33:15 PM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

One of the first rigs I worked on was a shallow water off shore platform in the Gulf of Mexico which was first drilled in the 1950’s capped in the 1960’s and brought back into production in the 1990’s. You drill it again and inject to bring these back into production.

There is lots of that going on and has been for a while.


17 posted on 01/02/2008 2:10:18 PM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

!!!


18 posted on 01/02/2008 2:12:28 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

You posted this
“(Better yet, what potentially productive wells can be uncapped?)”

I was just showing the ones that I know about
because I live about 1.5 miles from Denbury’s
CO2 plant, that should go online sometime this
spring.


19 posted on 01/02/2008 2:18:21 PM PST by WKB (FDT= Alabama's song from1982 He's "Close Enough To Perfect For Me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Yeah...”speculators.” Let’s keep telling ourselves that. LOL! The time of truth will probably come in June.

...better start cranking up the domestic manufacturing.


20 posted on 01/02/2008 3:22:07 PM PST by familyop ("I'll buy that for a dollar!" --C.M. Kornbluth, in "The Marching Morons")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson